[Bug middle-end/93644] [10/11/12 Regression] spurious -Wreturn-local-addr with PHI of PHI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93644 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|11.3|11.4 --- Comment #21 from Richard Biener --- GCC 11.3 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 11.4.
[Bug middle-end/93644] [10/11/12 Regression] spurious -Wreturn-local-addr with PHI of PHI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93644 George R. Goffe changed: What|Removed |Added CC||grgoffe at yahoo dot com --- Comment #20 from George R. Goffe --- Hi, I'm seeing this message from the "current" findutils. What is the solution? Best regards, George...
[Bug middle-end/93644] [10/11/12 Regression] spurious -Wreturn-local-addr with PHI of PHI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93644 --- Comment #19 from Martin Sebor --- GCC 12 has changed to point the warning at the closing curly as suggested in pr90735 so its output now looks like this: pr93644.c: In function ‘careadlinkat’: pr93644.c:30:1: warning: function may return address of local variable [-Wreturn-local-addr] 30 | } | ^ pr93644.c:6:8: note: declared here 6 | char stack_buf[1024]; |^ With that change the warning can also be suppressed by #pragma GCC diagnostic placed before the closing curly. GCC 12 also has separated the uninitialized predicate analyzer into a standalone module but no warning except -Wmaybe-uninitialized makes use of it yet. This bug might be an opportunity to try it out.
[Bug middle-end/93644] [10/11/12 Regression] spurious -Wreturn-local-addr with PHI of PHI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93644 --- Comment #18 from Eric Gallager --- This affects musl's getcwd implementation, btw: https://git.musl-libc.org/cgit/musl/tree/src/unistd/getcwd.c?id=v1.2.2
[Bug middle-end/93644] [10/11/12 Regression] spurious -Wreturn-local-addr with PHI of PHI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93644 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|11.2|11.3 --- Comment #17 from Richard Biener --- GCC 11.2 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 11.3
[Bug middle-end/93644] [10/11/12 Regression] spurious -Wreturn-local-addr with PHI of PHI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93644 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
[Bug middle-end/93644] [10/11/12 Regression] spurious -Wreturn-local-addr with PHI of PHI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93644 Jochen Roemmler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jochen447 at concept dot de --- Comment #16 from Jochen Roemmler --- Created attachment 50739 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50739&action=edit another minimal example to demonstrate the false alarm This is another instance of the test case. A senseless, yet perfectly valid piece of C code. It creates the false positive warning if compiled like this: gcc -Wreturn-local-addr -O1 -fisolate-erroneous-paths-dereference -c pr93644_2.c pr93644_2.c: In function ‘buildVname’: pr93644_2.c:28:12: warning: function may return address of local variable [-Wreturn-local-addr] 28 | return vname; |^ pr93644_2.c:18:17: note: declared here 18 | charbuf[256]; | ^~~ I'm using gcc version 11.1.1 20210428 (Red Hat 11.1.1-1) (GCC) However, I can silence the warning using # pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wreturn-local-addr"
[Bug middle-end/93644] [10/11/12 Regression] spurious -Wreturn-local-addr with PHI of PHI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93644 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|11.0|11.2 --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 11.1 has been released, retargeting bugs to GCC 11.2.
