[Bug middle-end/95681] False positive uninitialized variable usage in decNumberCompareTotalMag
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95681 --- Comment #4 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus --- Running todays mainline (d97d71a1989) using options -O3 -Wall against the reduced program on x86 as well as s390x results in t.c: In function 'decNumberCompareTotalMag': t.c:55:14: warning: '*allocbufa.bits' may be used uninitialized [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] 55 | a->bits&=~0x80; | ^~ t.c:70:14: warning: '*allocbufb.bits' may be used uninitialized [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] 70 | b->bits&=~0x80; | ^~
[Bug middle-end/95681] False positive uninitialized variable usage in decNumberCompareTotalMag
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95681 --- Comment #3 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus --- Created attachment 51160 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51160=edit Reduced program
[Bug middle-end/95681] False positive uninitialized variable usage in decNumberCompareTotalMag
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95681 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed||2021-07-09 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- Could you please reduce the warning to a standalone test case (or translation unit) and attach it to the report so that it can be more easily reproduced (with a cross-compiler) and analyzed?
[Bug middle-end/95681] False positive uninitialized variable usage in decNumberCompareTotalMag
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95681 --- Comment #1 from Jeffrey H. Johnson --- Confirm this behavior and reached same analysis with gcc version 11.1.1 20210531 (Red Hat 11.1.1-3) on x86_64.
