[Bug objc++/95013] [11 Regression] FAIL: obj-c++.dg/property/property-neg-6.mm syntax-error-10.mm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95013 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org, ||iains at gcc dot gnu.org, ||mikestump at comcast dot net --- Comment #1 from Eric Gallager --- cc-ing objc++ maintainers
[Bug objc++/95013] [11 Regression] FAIL: obj-c++.dg/property/property-neg-6.mm syntax-error-10.mm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95013 --- Comment #2 from Iain Sandoe --- please would you identify the platform(s) and configuration conditions? I don't see these on at least x86_64-linux-gnu, powerpc64-linux-gnu (m32, m64) or on Darwin15, 18, 19 (m32, m64) at r11-196
[Bug objc++/95013] [11 Regression] FAIL: obj-c++.dg/property/property-neg-6.mm syntax-error-10.mm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95013 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed||2020-05-10 Target Milestone|--- |11.0 CC||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org, ||ro at gcc dot gnu.org Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Version|10.0|11.0 --- Comment #3 from Rainer Orth --- I'm seeing them too on both sparc-sun-solaris2.11 and i386-pc-solaris2.11. My immediate suspicion would be that they are due to Nathan's patch: [C++] EOF has a location https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-May/545409.html Two of the source files (syntax-error-[89].mm lack a newline at EOF), and in all cases the message changed from obj-c++.dg/syntax-error-10.mm:1:1: error: expected identifier at end of input to obj-c++.dg/syntax-error-10.mm:1: error: expected identifier at end of input i.e. the column number got lost.
[Bug objc++/95013] [11 Regression] FAIL: obj-c++.dg/property/property-neg-6.mm syntax-error-10.mm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95013 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |iains at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #3) > I'm seeing them too on both sparc-sun-solaris2.11 and i386-pc-solaris2.11. > > My immediate suspicion would be that they are due to Nathan's patch: > > [C++] EOF has a location > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-May/545409.html > > Two of the source files (syntax-error-[89].mm lack a newline at EOF), and in > all > cases the message changed from > > obj-c++.dg/syntax-error-10.mm:1:1: error: expected identifier at end of input > > to > > obj-c++.dg/syntax-error-10.mm:1: error: expected identifier at end of input > > i.e. the column number got lost. yeah, my tests were just a few revisions before that patch - at r11-235 I see these on Darwin too, and it seems to be a case for fixing the tests.
[Bug objc++/95013] [11 Regression] FAIL: obj-c++.dg/property/property-neg-6.mm syntax-error-10.mm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95013 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|iains at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #4) > (In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #3) > > I'm seeing them too on both sparc-sun-solaris2.11 and i386-pc-solaris2.11. > > > > My immediate suspicion would be that they are due to Nathan's patch: > > > > [C++] EOF has a location > > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-May/545409.html > > obj-c++.dg/syntax-error-10.mm:1: error: expected identifier at end of input > > > > i.e. the column number got lost. > yeah, my tests were just a few revisions before that patch - at r11-235 I > see these on Darwin too, and it seems to be a case for fixing the tests. hmm maybe that's a diagnostics regression with the dangling colon (without the colon it would seem reasonable).
[Bug objc++/95013] [11 Regression] FAIL: obj-c++.dg/property/property-neg-6.mm syntax-error-10.mm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95013 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
[Bug objc++/95013] [11 Regression] FAIL: obj-c++.dg/property/property-neg-6.mm syntax-error-10.mm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95013 Bill Seurer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com --- Comment #6 from Bill Seurer --- These started with r11-204 and occur on powerpc64 BE and LE as well. commit debfaee5d51e3c07bb88a971618de2baff35d9c0 Author: Nathan Sidwell Date: Fri May 8 08:43:16 2020 -0700 EOF has a location There's no need to special-case EOF's location. For the complete file we give it a legitimate location. And for deferred parses we now zap a temporary EOF onto the next token, so we can just use its location anyway.
