[Bug other/40024] trunk/gcc-4.3/gcc: * emutls.c (emutls_destroy): Don' t fall out of the array bound.
--- Comment #4 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-27 16:05 --- I noticed for version 4.4 (x86_64-*-mingw* and i686-*-mingw*) this issue still exist. On 4.5 branch it is fixed. I would like that it the patch is getting applied on the 4.4.1 branch, too. It fixed a crash in emutls_destroy, we get for 4.4 branch. Any chance? Kai -- ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot ||org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40024
[Bug other/40024] trunk/gcc-4.3/gcc: * emutls.c (emutls_destroy): Don' t fall out of the array bound.
--- Comment #5 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-27 17:50 --- Subject: Bug 40024 Author: ktietz Date: Sat Jun 27 17:50:20 2009 New Revision: 149015 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=149015 Log: 2009-06-27 Kai Tietz kai.ti...@onevision.com Merged from trunk rev/148061 2009-06-01 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com PR other/40024 * emutls.c (__emutls_get_address): Change arr-size to mean number of allocated arr-data entries instead of # of slots + 1. Modified: branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/ChangeLog branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/emutls.c -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40024
[Bug other/40024] trunk/gcc-4.3/gcc: * emutls.c (emutls_destroy): Don' t fall out of the array bound.
--- Comment #6 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-27 17:52 --- Subject: Bug 40024 Author: ktietz Date: Sat Jun 27 17:52:29 2009 New Revision: 149016 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=149016 Log: 2009-06-27 Kai Tietz kai.ti...@onevision.com Merged from trunk rev/148061 2009-06-01 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com PR other/40024 * emutls.c (__emutls_get_address): Change arr-size to mean number of allocated arr-data entries instead of # of slots + 1. Modified: branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/ChangeLog branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/emutls.c -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40024
[Bug other/40024] trunk/gcc-4.3/gcc: * emutls.c (emutls_destroy): Don' t fall out of the array bound.
--- Comment #7 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-27 17:56 --- I did regression test for 4.3 and 4.4 branches and it was successful. I committed the patch for PR other/40024 to both branches. Committed revision 149015 for 4.3 branch and committed revision 149016 for 4.4 branch. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40024
[Bug other/40024] trunk/gcc-4.3/gcc: * emutls.c (emutls_destroy): Don' t fall out of the array bound.
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-27 17:56 --- Fixed. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Known to fail||4.3.3 4.4.0 Known to work||4.3.4 4.4.1 4.5.0 Resolution||FIXED Target Milestone|--- |4.3.4 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40024
[Bug other/40024] trunk/gcc-4.3/gcc: * emutls.c (emutls_destroy): Don' t fall out of the array bound.
--- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-01 18:03 --- Subject: Bug 40024 Author: jakub Date: Mon Jun 1 18:03:26 2009 New Revision: 148061 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=148061 Log: PR other/40024 * emutls.c (__emutls_get_address): Change arr-size to mean number of allocated arr-data entries instead of # of slots + 1. Modified: trunk/gcc/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/emutls.c -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40024
[Bug other/40024] trunk/gcc-4.3/gcc: * emutls.c (emutls_destroy): Don' t fall out of the array bound.
--- Comment #1 from dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-21 12:40 --- Confirmed -- dje at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dje at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC target triplet|i586-pc-mingw32 |i586-pc-mingw32,powerpc-ibm- ||aix Priority|P3 |P2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40024
[Bug other/40024] trunk/gcc-4.3/gcc: * emutls.c (emutls_destroy): Don' t fall out of the array bound.
--- Comment #2 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-21 12:53 --- See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-05/msg00248.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40024