[Bug other/40458] gcc flavours
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-16 13:01 --- Use --program-transform-name / --program-suffix. Directory names already contain the gcc version. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40458
[Bug other/40458] gcc flavours
--- Comment #2 from kai dot extern at googlemail dot com 2009-06-16 13:18 --- Subject: Re: gcc flavours rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org schrieb: > --- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-16 13:01 > --- > Use --program-transform-name / --program-suffix. Directory names already > contain the gcc version. Maybe I was too short with the description. Same version, something else different should also work, so there need to be different directory names. That is, the two gcc's should not share *anything*. This means you'd also need to set some lib paths. The effect should be similar to a different --prefix, except done not by changing the top level but lower. I believe I've seen tips to do this seen at least twice in the recent past, so it seems to me it would be good to be able to do it with one option instead of having to know to combine three or so. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40458
[Bug other/40458] gcc flavours
--- Comment #3 from jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com 2009-06-16 13:23 --- for the record: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2009-06/msg00173.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40458
[Bug other/40458] gcc flavours
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-16 15:14 --- Or use --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs . -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40458
[Bug other/40458] gcc flavours
--- Comment #5 from jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com 2009-06-16 15:40 --- (In reply to comment #4) > Or use --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs . > That's been broken for some time on x86_64, see bug 32415 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40458
[Bug other/40458] gcc flavours
--- Comment #6 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-08 10:47 --- (In reply to comment #0) If it's just about the version, perhaps you can make -V working again. Requires a working --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs of course. :) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40458
[Bug other/40458] gcc flavours
--- Comment #7 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-08 10:49 --- (In reply to comment #6) > If it's just about the version, perhaps you can make -V working again. Oh same version. Change the above to "make -b working again". -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40458