[Bug other/62002] -fcilkplus switch breaks format attribute.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62002 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX --- Comment #8 from Paolo Carlini --- Cilk Plus, deprecated for 7.x, will not be in 8.x.
[Bug other/62002] -fcilkplus switch breaks format attribute.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62002 Vincenzo Romano changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vincenzo.romano at notorand dot it --- Comment #7 from Vincenzo Romano --- The original code snippet is wrong. It should read void bar(char const *, ...) __attribute__((__format__(__printf__, 1, 2))); instead of void bar(char const *, ...) __attribute__((__format__(__printf__, 2, 3))); Accordingly to the documentation at https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Common-Function-Attributes.html#Common-Function-Attributes The second __format__() argument is the 1-based position of the formatting string, while the third one is the 1-based position of the first argument to be checked.
[Bug other/62002] -fcilkplus switch breaks format attribute.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62002 --- Comment #6 from Viacheslav Chernyshev --- Still happens on 5.3.0.
[Bug other/62002] -fcilkplus switch breaks format attribute.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62002 Viacheslav Chernyshev astellar at ro dot ru changed: What|Removed |Added Version|4.9.2 |5.1.0 --- Comment #5 from Viacheslav Chernyshev astellar at ro dot ru --- I would like to resurrect this bugreport, as the same problem still happens with GCC 5.1.
[Bug other/62002] -fcilkplus switch breaks format attribute.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62002
Igor Zamyatin izamyatin at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||izamyatin at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from Igor Zamyatin izamyatin at gmail dot com ---
Am I correct that adding -fcilkplus just fixes the bug somehow?
I see that regular trunk g++ gives error for
struct foo
{
void bar(void *my_object, char const *, ...)
__attribute__((__format__(__printf__, 2, 3)));
};
which is supposed to be correct according to the
docs(https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Function-Attributes.html#Function-Attributes)
[Bug other/62002] -fcilkplus switch breaks format attribute.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62002 --- Comment #3 from Viacheslav Chernyshev astellar at ro dot ru --- No, fcilkplus switch triggers compilation error when code is perfectly valid. Your example is wrong, as in C++ this pointer is an implicit first argument of member function.
[Bug other/62002] -fcilkplus switch breaks format attribute.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62002 --- Comment #4 from Igor Zamyatin izamyatin at gmail dot com --- Right, it is mentioned explicitly in the docs. Will take a look
[Bug other/62002] -fcilkplus switch breaks format attribute.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62002 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed||2014-08-03 CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Confirmed.
