[Bug regression/18906] Assembler complains about previously acceptable code

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-12-09 
16:51 ---
Still not a gcc bug, I cannot be as it is complaining about the inline asm and 
not what gcc produces.

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution||INVALID


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18906

[Bug regression/18906] Assembler complains about previously acceptable code

[orion at cora dot nwra dot com]

--- Additional Comments From orion at cora dot nwra dot com  2004-12-09 
16:49 ---
Changed to:

static inline int cpuid_edx(int op)
{
 int eax, ecx, edx;

 __asm__("pushl %%ebx\n\tcpuid\n\tpopl %%ebx"
 : "=a" (eax), "=c" (ecx), "=d" (edx)
 : "a" (op));
 return edx;
}

int RIGHT_CPU(void)
{
 return cpuid_edx(1);
}

Still get the same error:

# gcc4 -c sse2-cpuid.c
/tmp/ccAQFD0o.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/ccAQFD0o.s:27: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `push'
/tmp/ccAQFD0o.s:29: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `pop'


-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
 Resolution|INVALID |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18906

[Bug regression/18906] Assembler complains about previously acceptable code

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-12-09 
16:38 ---
Not a bug, you want pushl and popl instead.

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution||INVALID


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18906