[Bug regression/54374] analysis for "may be used uninitialized" degraded...

2012-09-04 Thread gbburkhardt at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54374

--- Comment #3 from Glenn Burkhardt  2012-09-04 
21:40:55 UTC ---
I'd be more convinced about 'works for me' if I could see the full version
number of the compiler.  I've just double checked that the files I uploaded are
correct, and tried it with gcc 4.6.1 and 4.6.3, with the same result.  -m32 or
-m64 doesn't matter.


[Bug regression/54374] analysis for "may be used uninitialized" degraded...

2012-09-03 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54374

Richard Guenther  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords||diagnostic
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution||WORKSFORME

--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther  2012-09-03 
10:05:18 UTC ---
Works for me:

> gcc-4.6 -O2 -Wall -S e?.c -m32
e0.c: In function 'main':
e0.c:277:21: warning: 'level' may be used uninitialized in this function
[-Wuninitialized]
e0.c:279:12: warning: 'portno' may be used uninitialized in this function
[-Wuninitialized]
e1.c: In function 'main':
e1.c:277:11: warning: 'level' may be used uninitialized in this function
[-Wuninitialized]
e1.c:277:11: warning: 'portno' may be used uninitialized in this function
[-Wuninitialized]


[Bug regression/54374] analysis for "may be used uninitialized" degraded...

2012-08-25 Thread gbburkhardt at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54374

--- Comment #1 from Glenn Burkhardt  2012-08-25 
16:20:11 UTC ---
Created attachment 28084
  --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28084
example code