[Bug rtl-optimization/102627] [11 Regression] wrong code with "-O1"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102627 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu --- Fixed for GCC 12 and 11.3.
[Bug rtl-optimization/102627] [11 Regression] wrong code with "-O1"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102627 --- Comment #8 from Vladimir Makarov --- I've committed the patch to gcc-11 branch too after nobody made complaints about the patch in the trunk. I've also successfully tested and bootstrapped the patch on the branch too.
[Bug rtl-optimization/102627] [11 Regression] wrong code with "-O1"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102627 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Vladimir Makarov : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:99d21577f8a00196f3133fe1066de6e3e7d180c1 commit r11-9154-g99d21577f8a00196f3133fe1066de6e3e7d180c1 Author: Vladimir N. Makarov Date: Fri Oct 8 10:16:09 2021 -0400 [PR102627] Use at least natural mode during splitting hard reg live range In the PR test case SImode was used to split live range of cx on x86-64 because it was the biggest mode for this hard reg in the function. But all 64-bits of cx contain structure members. We need always to use at least natural mode of hard reg in splitting to fix this problem. gcc/ChangeLog: PR rtl-optimization/102627 * lra-constraints.c (split_reg): Use at least natural mode of hard reg. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: PR rtl-optimization/102627 * gcc.target/i386/pr102627.c: New test.
[Bug rtl-optimization/102627] [11 Regression] wrong code with "-O1"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102627 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org Summary|[11/12 Regression] wrong|[11 Regression] wrong code |code with "-O1" |with "-O1" Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Fixed on the trunk so far.
