[Bug rtl-optimization/15414] Failure in compiling very huge C program

2008-12-29 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #8 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-12-29 15:18 ---
Test case compiled flawlessly with ~ 530 mb
maximum memory usage with -O3 on current trunk
on i686-pc-linux-gnu.

I'd say this is fixed.


-- 

tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15414

[Bug rtl-optimization/15414] Failure in compiling very huge C program

2005-07-30 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-07-31 
05:17 ---
Hmm, on powerpc-darwin on the mainline, we spike up to 900MB for some reason 
and then drop back 
down to 400MB.

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 Status|WAITING |NEW
 GCC target triplet||powerpc-darwin
   Last reconfirmed|2005-06-25 13:16:51 |2005-07-31 05:17:07
   date||


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15414

[Bug rtl-optimization/15414] Failure in compiling very huge C program

2005-07-30 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-07-31 
05:36 ---
The memory is not in GC at all.  I don't which pass is allocating the memory.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15414

[Bug rtl-optimization/15414] Failure in compiling very huge C program

2005-06-25 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 

--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-06-25 
13:16 ---
The test case from l8120l.i.bz2 compiles flawlessly with GCC CVS HEAD.  The 
maximum memory footprint I get is 350MB. 
 
Not sure what to do with this bug, I don't see a problem anymore.  Which 
compilers failed, and which succeed? 

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

   Last reconfirmed|2004-09-23 13:34:23 |2005-06-25 13:16:51
   date||


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15414

[Bug rtl-optimization/15414] Failure in compiling very huge C program

2004-12-02 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-12-02 
23:29 ---
We need the preprocessed source of the failing source?
Maybe you could put it up on a web site or an ftp server.

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |WAITING


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15414