[Bug rtl-optimization/48133] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE: in get_loop_body, at cfgloop.c:831 with -O -funroll-loops -fthread-jumps -fno-tree-ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48133 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #16 from Marek Polacek 2013-02-13 17:31:29 UTC --- Seems like it, thus -> fixed.
[Bug rtl-optimization/48133] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE: in get_loop_body, at cfgloop.c:831 with -O -funroll-loops -fthread-jumps -fno-tree-ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48133 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #15 from Marek Polacek 2013-02-08 17:37:04 UTC --- The testcases no longer fail for me; can this be closed now?
[Bug rtl-optimization/48133] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE: in get_loop_body, at cfgloop.c:831 with -O -funroll-loops -fthread-jumps -fno-tree-ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48133 --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-08-10 06:17:44 UTC --- (In reply to comment #13) seems to work for me now > jh@gcc10:~/trunk/build/gcc$ ./gfortran -O2 -c t.f90 -B ./ > jh@gcc10:~/trunk/build/gcc$ cat t.f90 > SUBROUTINE goo() > IMPLICIT NONE > CHARACTER(len=9),SAVE :: s > INTEGER,SAVE :: i,j,k > i=0 > j=0 > DO WHILE (i==0) >CALL goo1(s) >IF (INDEX(s,'$')/=1 .AND. INDEX(s,'!')/=1) THEN > CALL goo2(k) > IF (k>0) THEN > i=1 > END IF >END IF > END DO > END SUBROUTINE > ! gfortran -O2 -c goo.f90 > > (similarly with the C testcase). It would be nice to know what fixed it. H.J, > do you think you can track it? The #c0 testcase stopped ICEing with http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185913 and the #c13 testcase just ICEd a few revisions around r185950.
[Bug rtl-optimization/48133] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE: in get_loop_body, at cfgloop.c:831 with -O -funroll-loops -fthread-jumps -fno-tree-ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48133 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Comment #13 from Jan Hubicka 2012-08-10 05:38:10 UTC --- This seems to work for me now jh@gcc10:~/trunk/build/gcc$ ./gfortran -O2 -c t.f90 -B ./ jh@gcc10:~/trunk/build/gcc$ cat t.f90 SUBROUTINE goo() IMPLICIT NONE CHARACTER(len=9),SAVE :: s INTEGER,SAVE :: i,j,k i=0 j=0 DO WHILE (i==0) CALL goo1(s) IF (INDEX(s,'$')/=1 .AND. INDEX(s,'!')/=1) THEN CALL goo2(k) IF (k>0) THEN i=1 END IF END IF END DO END SUBROUTINE ! gfortran -O2 -c goo.f90 (similarly with the C testcase). It would be nice to know what fixed it. H.J, do you think you can track it?
