[Bug sanitizer/109882] -fsanitize=thread #include transitively includes sanitizer/common_interface_defs.h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109882 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed||2023-05-16 Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- The header is included since r13-2677-g0abc63a5ea4550 (and r12-9342-g0cec4e9cd44e25 on the branch), and not including it would mean not being able to annotate atomic>. I agree with Andrew, this is a bug in libsanitizer. The correct way to use __has_feature in a public header is to test with #ifdef __has_feature not to define the fallback definition.
[Bug sanitizer/109882] -fsanitize=thread #include transitively includes sanitizer/common_interface_defs.h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109882 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Then you should file this bug upstream with the sanitizer for the way __has_feature is handled incorrectly.
[Bug sanitizer/109882] -fsanitize=thread #include transitively includes sanitizer/common_interface_defs.h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109882 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|libstdc++ |sanitizer CC||dodji at gcc dot gnu.org, ||dvyukov at gcc dot gnu.org, ||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, ||kcc at gcc dot gnu.org, ||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Anyways I am going to declare this a bug in the sanitizer headers rather than libstdc++ headers.
