[Bug sanitizer/94076] libsanitizer fails with 64-bit time_t

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94076

Andrew Pinski  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|WAITING |SUSPENDED
   See Also||https://bugs.llvm.org/show_
   ||bug.cgi?id=45138

--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski  ---
Suspended is better here than waiting.

[Bug sanitizer/94076] libsanitizer fails with 64-bit time_t

[jakub at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94076

--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek  ---
Well, 64-bit time_t/off_t/ino_t on an arch where they weren't previously 64-bit
is an ABI change which of course needs to have support added to various parts
of the toolchain, including libsanitizer (for which it should go through the
upstream).

[Bug sanitizer/94076] libsanitizer fails with 64-bit time_t

[arnd at linaro dot org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94076

--- Comment #2 from Arnd Bergmann  ---
I'm not at the point of the bootstrap where I can attempt building llvm, but I
opened another report at https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45138 anyway.

[Bug sanitizer/94076] libsanitizer fails with 64-bit time_t

[marxin at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94076

Martin Liška  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
   Last reconfirmed||2020-03-06
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška  ---
Can you see the same on llvm? Note that libsanitizer library is taken from
LLVM, so I would recommend to report that to upstream.