[Bug target/100808] PPC: ISA 3.1 builtin documentation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100808 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED --- Comment #6 from Bill Schmidt --- Ugh, bad commit message... but fixed.
[Bug target/100808] PPC: ISA 3.1 builtin documentation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100808 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by William Schmidt : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8cb748a31cd8c7ac9c88b6abc38ce077dd462a7a commit r12-7060-g8cb748a31cd8c7ac9c88b6abc38ce077dd462a7a Author: Bill Schmidt Date: Fri Feb 4 13:26:44 2022 -0600 rs6000: Clean up ISA 3.1 documentation [PR100808] Due to a pasto error in the documentation, vec_replace_unaligned was implemented with the same function prototypes as vec_replace_elt. It was intended that vec_replace_unaligned always specify output vectors as having type vector unsigned char, to emphasize that elements are potentially misaligned by this built-in function. This patch corrects the misimplementation. 2022-02-04 Bill Schmidt gcc/ PR target/100808 * doc/extend.texi (Basic PowerPC Built-in Functions Available on ISA 3.1): Provide consistent type names. Remove unnecessary semicolons. Fix bad line breaks.
[Bug target/100808] PPC: ISA 3.1 builtin documentation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100808 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed||2022-02-04 Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 from Bill Schmidt --- Confirmed, I'll clean it up.
[Bug target/100808] PPC: ISA 3.1 builtin documentation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100808 --- Comment #3 from Jens Seifert --- - Avoid additional "int" unsigned long long int => unsigned long long Why? Those are exactly the same types! Yes, but the rest of the documentation uses unsigned long long. This is just for consistency with existing documentation.
[Bug target/100808] PPC: ISA 3.1 builtin documentation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100808 --- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool --- (In reply to Jens Seifert from comment #0) > - Avoid additional "int" unsigned long long int => unsigned long long Why? Those are exactly the same types! > - add missing line breaks between builtins > - remove semicolons Patches welcome. Comment 1 is a separate issue, please use a different bug to track that.
