[Bug target/108703] insn does not satisfy its constraints: movhi_insn at -O1

[vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108703

Vladimir Makarov  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #3 from Vladimir Makarov  ---
Here is my analysis of the problem/

Before IRA we already have:

(insn 10 7 11 2 (set (reg:HI 33 %f1)
(reg:HI 35 %f3)) "/home/vmakarov/testcase.c":8:3 114 {*movhi_insn}
 (expr_list:REG_EQUAL (const_int 13107 [0x])
(nil)))

LRA considers the insn is correct and does not check constraints as it
is simple move and its cost is 2.  This is standard convention for ignoring
constraints since the very early versions of reload pass.  And as I remember,
it is described somewhere in GCC documentation.

I think we should avoid to generate such insn from the start because
ignoring the reload convention will result in many unexpected
consequences where LRA speed slowdown probably would be a minor negative
consequence.

[Bug target/108703] insn does not satisfy its constraints: movhi_insn at -O1

[ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108703

Eric Botcazou  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
   Assignee|ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org   |unassigned at gcc dot 
gnu.org

--- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou  ---
Too pathological.

[Bug target/108703] insn does not satisfy its constraints: movhi_insn at -O1

[ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108703

Eric Botcazou  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org  |ebotcazou at gcc dot 
gnu.org
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Summary|ICE: in |insn does not satisfy its
   |extract_constrain_insn, at  |constraints: movhi_insn at
   |recog.cc:2692 (insn does|-O1
   |not satisfy its |
   |constraints: movhi_insn) on |
   |sparc64 at -O1  |