[Bug target/11594] testcase gcc.dg/20020103-1.c fails with "scan-assembler-not LC"

2008-12-12 Thread janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #12 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-12-12 19:37 ---
Fixed.

>From the patch mail:

The scan assembler check in gcc.dg/20020103-1.c is now XPASS for all powerpc
targets reported in the gcc-testresults archive.  It started passing for
powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu with -m32 sometime between r139537 (2008-08-25) and
r139604 (2008-08-27).  This patch removes the xfail for that check.

The test fails for powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu with -m64, so I left the
restriction that on powerpc*-*-* it it only run for ilp32.


-- 

janis at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11594

[Bug target/11594] testcase gcc.dg/20020103-1.c fails with "scan-assembler-not LC"

2008-12-12 Thread janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #11 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-12-12 19:36 ---
Subject: Bug 11594

Author: janis
Date: Fri Dec 12 19:34:48 2008
New Revision: 142718

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=142718
Log:
PR target/11594
* gcc.dg/20020103-1.c: Remove XFAIL for powerpc.

Modified:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/20020103-1.c


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11594

[Bug target/11594] testcase gcc.dg/20020103-1.c fails with "scan-assembler-not LC"

2008-02-04 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #10 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-02-04 18:12 ---
oops, sorry!


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11594

[Bug target/11594] testcase gcc.dg/20020103-1.c fails with "scan-assembler-not LC"

2008-02-04 Thread janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #9 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-02-04 17:53 ---
It doesn't show up as FAIL for powerpc*-*-linux* becaues that check includes an
xfail:

  /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "LC\[0-9\]" { xfail powerpc*-*-* } } } */

Reopened.


-- 

janis at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
 Resolution|FIXED   |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11594

[Bug target/11594] testcase gcc.dg/20020103-1.c fails with "scan-assembler-not LC"

2008-02-03 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #8 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-02-03 14:57 ---
I don't see this FAIL in any recently reported test results (on the
gcc-testresults mainling list) for powerpc-linux or powerpc64-linux.  Thus,
fixed.


-- 

steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11594

[Bug target/11594] testcase gcc.dg/20020103-1.c fails with "scan-assembler-not LC"

2006-09-20 Thread pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 


--- Comment #7 from pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu  2006-09-21 01:06 
---
Subject: Re:  testcase gcc.dg/20020103-1.c fails with "scan-assembler-not LC"

> 
> 
> 
> --- Comment #6 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu  2006-09-20 
> 23:49 ---
> Does anyone know why we don't run this test at lp64 on powerpc? I find that on
> powerpc-apple-darwin8 the following changes allow...
> 
> make check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix'{-m32,-m64}'
> dg.exp=20020103-1.*"
> 
> to pass at both -m32 and -m64 on Darwin PPC...

Yes because AIX uses TOC, just like ppc64-linux so you will get LC for sure.

-- Pinski


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11594

Re: [Bug target/11594] testcase gcc.dg/20020103-1.c fails with "scan-assembler-not LC"

2006-09-20 Thread Andrew Pinski 
> 
> 
> 
> --- Comment #6 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu  2006-09-20 
> 23:49 ---
> Does anyone know why we don't run this test at lp64 on powerpc? I find that on
> powerpc-apple-darwin8 the following changes allow...
> 
> make check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix'{-m32,-m64}'
> dg.exp=20020103-1.*"
> 
> to pass at both -m32 and -m64 on Darwin PPC...

Yes because AIX uses TOC, just like ppc64-linux so you will get LC for sure.

-- Pinski

[Bug target/11594] testcase gcc.dg/20020103-1.c fails with "scan-assembler-not LC"

2006-09-20 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 


--- Comment #6 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu  2006-09-20 
23:49 ---
Does anyone know why we don't run this test at lp64 on powerpc? I find that on
powerpc-apple-darwin8 the following changes allow...

make check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix'{-m32,-m64}'
dg.exp=20020103-1.*"

to pass at both -m32 and -m64 on Darwin PPC...

Index: gcc.dg/20020103-1.c
===
--- gcc.dg/20020103-1.c (revision 117095)
+++ gcc.dg/20020103-1.c (working copy)
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
 /* Verify that constant equivalences get reloaded properly, either by being
spilled to the stack, or regenerated, but not dropped to memory.  */
-/* { dg-do compile { target { { i?86-*-* rs6000-*-* alpha*-*-* x86_64-*-* } ||
{ powerpc*-*-* && ilp32 } } } } */
+/* { dg-do compile { target { i?86-*-* rs6000-*-* alpha*-*-* x86_64-*-*
powerpc*-*-* } } } */
 /* { dg-options "-O2 -fpic -fno-omit-frame-pointer
-fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables" } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "LC\[0-9\]" { xfail powerpc*-*-* } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "LC\[0-9\]" } } */

 /* Clobber all call-saved registers that can hold a pointer value.  */
 #if defined(__i386__)

Could someone test this on AIX?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11594

[Bug target/11594] testcase gcc.dg/20020103-1.c fails with "scan-assembler-not LC"

2006-04-18 Thread amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 


-- 

amodra at bigpond dot net dot au changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|amodra at bigpond dot net   |unassigned at gcc dot gnu
   |dot au  |dot org
 Status|ASSIGNED|NEW


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11594

[Bug target/11594] testcase gcc.dg/20020103-1.c fails with "scan-assembler-not LC"

2006-04-18 Thread janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #5 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-04-18 16:52 ---
As of mainline 20060417 the test is still failing on powerpc-linux, although it
passes for AIX and Darwin.  Until December 2005 when Alan fixed the target
specifier, the test had not been run on powerpc64-linux with -m32.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11594

[Bug target/11594] testcase gcc.dg/20020103-1.c fails with "scan-assembler-not LC"

2005-10-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 


-- 
   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|3.4.5   |---


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11594

[Bug target/11594] testcase gcc.dg/20020103-1.c fails with "scan-assembler-not LC"

2005-05-19 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 


-- 
   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|3.4.4   |3.4.5


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11594

[Bug target/11594] testcase gcc.dg/20020103-1.c fails with "scan-assembler-not LC"

2004-11-25 Thread amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 


-- 
   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|--- |3.4.4


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11594

[Bug target/11594] testcase gcc.dg/20020103-1.c fails with "scan-assembler-not LC"

2004-11-25 Thread amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 


-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Last reconfirmed|2004-01-16 19:24:35 |2004-11-26 05:49:38
   date||


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11594

[Bug target/11594] testcase gcc.dg/20020103-1.c fails with "scan-assembler-not LC"

2004-11-25 Thread amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 

--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au  2004-11-26 
05:49 ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-11/msg00583.html

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords||patch


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11594