[Bug target/17589] segfault while running code compiled with -ftree-vectorize

2005-09-24 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-09-24 
16:55 ---
This is a glibc issue and nothing else.

Closing as invalid.

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||INVALID


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17589

[Bug target/17589] segfault while running code compiled with -ftree-vectorize

2004-10-27 Thread dorit at il dot ibm dot com 

--- Additional Comments From dorit at il dot ibm dot com  2004-10-27 11:48 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
 Can anyone reproduce the problem on i686-linux (P4)?

I wasn't able to reporoduce it on i686-pc-linux-gnu.

This might be related to PR18173.

Is PREFERRED_STACK_BOUNDARY != STACK_BOUNDARY in the platform in question? 
maybe that's the problem? (this deson't seem to be the problem thought in 
PR18173).



-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17589

[Bug target/17589] segfault while running code compiled with -ftree-vectorize

2004-10-27 Thread berndtrog at yahoo dot com 

--- Additional Comments From berndtrog at yahoo dot com  2004-10-27 15:56 ---
Hmm, there seems to be a relation between the
version of glibc an this bug:

glibc-2.2 segfault
glibc-2.2.5 NO segfault
glibc-2.3.3 NO segfault

Can anyone try 
make check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS=vect.exp 
with an old distribution(glibc-2.2) on a sse2 system?

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17589