[Bug target/18351] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: XPASS: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c

[hp at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-02-02 03:37 
---
Also part of PR 19745 (cris-elf).

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

OtherBugsDependingO||19745
  nThis||


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18351

[Bug target/18351] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: XPASS: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.0.0   |---


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18351

[Bug target/18351] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: XPASS: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c

[hp at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-11-09 09:48 
---
Confirmed, separate system than original report, with "Tue Nov  9 00:36:20 UTC
2004" (no .log reconfirmation)

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

   Last reconfirmed|2004-11-07 06:57:04 |2004-11-09 09:48:42
   date||


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18351

[Bug target/18351] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: XPASS: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-11-07 
06:57 ---
Reading the comment in the testcase it looks like it is hard to decide wether 
or not to xfail it:
/* ??? Ug.  This one may or may not fail based on how fold decides
   that the && should be emitted (based on BRANCH_COST).  Fix this
   by teaching dom to look through && and register all components
   as true.  */

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Ever Confirmed||1
   Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-11-07 06:57:04
   date||


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18351

[Bug target/18351] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: XPASS: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c

[hp at gcc dot gnu dot org]

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18351