[Bug target/18615] biarch bootstrap fails on sparc-linux (CVS 20041121)

2005-01-18 Thread christian dot joensson at gmail dot com

--- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com  
2005-01-18 08:18 ---
without the libjava tests having run through, this is what I have right now 
(posting of full test results will come later today)

Aurora SPARC Linux Corona (FC3-ish) UltraSparc IIi (Sabre) sun4u:

binutils-2.15.92.0.2-5 - sparc
bison-1.875c-2 - sparc
dejagnu-1.4.4-2 - noarch
expect-5.42.1-1 - sparc
gcc-3.4.2-6.fc3 - sparc
gcc4-4.0.0-0.8sparc - sparc
glibc-2.3.3-99 - sparcv9
glibc-2.3.3-99 - sparc64
glibc-headers-2.3.3-99 - sparc64
glibc-kernheaders-2.6-17sparc - sparc
kernel-2.6.10-1.1063sp2 - sparc64
package kernel-smp is not installed
make-3.80-3 - sparc
nptl-devel-2.3.3-99 - sparcv9
tcl-8.4.5-7 - sparc

LAST_UPDATED: Mon Jan 17 07:44:17 UTC 2005

=== acats tests ===
FAIL:   c32001e
FAIL:   c330001
FAIL:   c43214c
FAIL:   c52011a
FAIL:   c62003a
FAIL:   c62003b
FAIL:   c64103e
FAIL:   c64103f
FAIL:   c64104j
FAIL:   c64104k
FAIL:   c64104l
FAIL:   c64104m
FAIL:   c64104n
FAIL:   c64105b
FAIL:   c95086b
FAIL:   c96005d
FAIL:   cb3004a
FAIL:   cb4001a
FAIL:   cc1221d
FAIL:   cc3017c
FAIL:   cc3120a
FAIL:   cd2b11a
FAIL:   cd2b11b

=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes1944
# of unexpected failures23
# of unsupported tests  355
Native configuration is sparc-unknown-linux-gnu

=== gcc tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-66.c scan-tree-dump-times Alignment of access forced 
using peeling 1
XPASS: gcc.dg/vect/vect-85.c scan-tree-dump-times vectorized 1 loops 1

=== gcc Summary ===

# of expected passes32180
# of unexpected failures1
# of unexpected successes   1
# of expected failures  98
# of untested testcases 28
# of unsupported tests  481
/usr/local/src/trunk/objdir32/gcc/xgcc  version 4.0.0 20050117 (experimental)

=== gfortran tests ===


Running target unix
XPASS: gfortran.dg/ret_pointer_1.f90  -O0  execution test
XPASS: gfortran.dg/ret_pointer_1.f90  -O1  execution test
XPASS: gfortran.dg/ret_pointer_1.f90  -O2  execution test
XPASS: gfortran.dg/ret_pointer_1.f90  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer  execution test
XPASS: gfortran.dg/ret_pointer_1.f90  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops  
execution test
XPASS: gfortran.dg/ret_pointer_1.f90  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-
loops -finline-functions  execution test
XPASS: gfortran.dg/ret_pointer_1.f90  -O3 -g  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/forall_3.f90 execution,  -O1 
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/intrinsic_present.f90 compilation,  -O0 
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/intrinsic_transpose.f90 execution,  -O0 
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/intrinsic_transpose.f90 execution,  -O1 

=== gfortran Summary ===

# of expected passes5006
# of unexpected failures4
# of unexpected successes   7
# of expected failures  19
# of untested testcases 1
# of unsupported tests  8
/usr/local/src/trunk/objdir32/gcc/testsuite/../gfortran  version 4.0.0 
20050117 (experimental)

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/pch/empty.C -g (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/pch/empty.C -O2 -g (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/pch/empty.C -O2 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/pch/externc-1.C -g (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/pch/externc-1.C -O2 -g (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/pch/externc-1.C -O2 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/pch/static-1.C -g (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/pch/static-1.C -O2 -g (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/pch/static-1.C -O2 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/pch/system-1.C -g (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/pch/system-1.C -O2 -g (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/pch/system-1.C -O2 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/pch/system-2.C -g (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/pch/system-2.C -O2 -g (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/pch/system-2.C -O2 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/pch/uninst.C -g (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/pch/uninst.C -O2 -g (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/pch/uninst.C -O2 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/pch/wchar-1.C -g (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/pch/wchar-1.C -O2 -g (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/pch/wchar-1.C -O2 (test for excess errors)
WARNING: g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p10769a.C compilation failed to produce 
executable
XPASS: g++.old-deja/g++.other/init5.C execution test
FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.pt/crash25.C (test for excess errors)

=== g++ Summary ===

# of expected passes10462
# of unexpected failures22
# of unexpected successes   1
# of expected failures  71
# of untested testcases 21
# of unsupported tests  89
/usr/local/src/trunk/objdir32/gcc/testsuite/../g++  version 4.0.0 20050117 
(experimental)

=== objc tests ===


Running target un

[Bug target/18615] biarch bootstrap fails on sparc-linux (CVS 20041121)

2005-01-17 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-01-18 
07:43 ---
> sucessfully bootstrapped, test results at
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-01/msg00805.html

Great!  The number of Ada failures is unexpected though, maybe related to the
change of calling conventions for complex types.

Btw, if the machine is available for some more hours, it would also be nice to
test both architectures in a row, with

  make -k check RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix{,-m64}"

('\' might be required before the '{' and '}', depending on the shell)


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18615


[Bug target/18615] biarch bootstrap fails on sparc-linux (CVS 20041121)

2005-01-17 Thread debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org

--- Additional Comments From debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org  
2005-01-18 07:18 ---
sucessfully bootstrapped, test results at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-01/msg00805.html

  Matthias

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18615


[Bug target/18615] biarch bootstrap fails on sparc-linux (CVS 20041121)

2005-01-17 Thread christian dot joensson at gmail dot com

--- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com  
2005-01-17 12:18 ---
how's it going?

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18615


[Bug target/18615] biarch bootstrap fails on sparc-linux (CVS 20041121)

2005-01-15 Thread debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org

--- Additional Comments From debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org  
2005-01-15 12:00 ---
started a new build ...


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18615


[Bug target/18615] biarch bootstrap fails on sparc-linux (CVS 20041121)

2005-01-15 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-01-15 
10:51 ---
Any news on this, Matthias?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18615


[Bug target/18615] biarch bootstrap fails on sparc-linux (CVS 20041121)

2004-12-04 Thread debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org

--- Additional Comments From debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org  
2004-12-04 16:27 ---
currently no access to the machine, where I started the build. will update until
I get access again.

  Matthias

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18615


[Bug target/18615] biarch bootstrap fails on sparc-linux (CVS 20041121)

2004-11-28 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-11-28 
13:37 ---
simplify_gen_subreg was seriously shaken recently.  Would you mind updating and
trying again?


-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18615


[Bug target/18615] biarch bootstrap fails on sparc-linux (CVS 20041121)

2004-11-28 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org


-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu   |ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot
   |dot org |org
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18615


[Bug target/18615] biarch bootstrap fails on sparc-linux (CVS 20041121)

2004-11-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org


-- 
   What|Removed |Added

   Severity|enhancement |minor


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18615


[Bug target/18615] biarch bootstrap fails on sparc-linux (CVS 20041121)

2004-11-22 Thread debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org

--- Additional Comments From debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org  
2004-11-23 07:56 ---
> I presume sparc64-linux does bootstrap fine?
No, bootstrap on sparc64-linux fails earlier in stage2, submitted as PR18622.

  Matthias


-- 
   What|Removed |Added

   Severity|normal  |enhancement


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18615


[Bug target/18615] biarch bootstrap fails on sparc-linux (CVS 20041121)

2004-11-22 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-11-22 
22:45 ---
I presume sparc64-linux does bootstrap fine?


-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 CC|ebotcazou at libertysurf dot|ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot
   |fr  |org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18615


[Bug target/18615] biarch bootstrap fails on sparc-linux (CVS 20041121)

2004-11-22 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org


-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
   ||org
   Severity|enhancement |normal
   Keywords||build, ice-on-valid-code


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18615


[Bug target/18615] biarch bootstrap fails on sparc-linux (CVS 20041121)

2004-11-22 Thread debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org

--- Additional Comments From debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org  
2004-11-22 22:39 ---
Created an attachment (id=7583)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7583&action=view)
preprocessed source


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18615


[Bug target/18615] biarch bootstrap fails on sparc-linux (CVS 20041121)

2004-11-22 Thread debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org

--- Additional Comments From debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org  
2004-11-22 22:38 ---
Created an attachment (id=7582)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7582&action=view)
biarch patch


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18615