[Bug target/20166] Bootstrap failure due to lack of fixinclude of pthread problem
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-21 16:18 --- Subject: Bug 20166 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-4_0-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-21 16:17:55 Modified files: fixincludes: ChangeLog inclhack.def fixincl.x fixincludes/tests/base: pthread.h Log message: 2005-03-21 Richard Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR target/20166 * inclhack.def: Add fix for array of incomplete structures in function prototype in pthread.h. * fixincl.x: Regenerate. * tests/base/pthread.h: Adjust. Patches: http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/fixincludes/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcconly_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branchr1=1.32.2.1r2=1.32.2.2 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/fixincludes/inclhack.def.diff?cvsroot=gcconly_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branchr1=1.16.14.1r2=1.16.14.2 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/fixincludes/fixincl.x.diff?cvsroot=gcconly_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branchr1=1.16.14.1r2=1.16.14.2 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/fixincludes/tests/base/pthread.h.diff?cvsroot=gcconly_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branchr1=1.3r2=1.3.16.1 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20166
[Bug target/20166] Bootstrap failure due to lack of fixinclude of pthread problem
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-21 16:46 --- Subject: Bug 20166 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-21 16:46:09 Modified files: fixincludes: ChangeLog inclhack.def fixincl.x fixincludes/tests/base: pthread.h Log message: 2005-03-21 Richard Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR target/20166 * inclhack.def: Add fix for array of incomplete structures in function prototype in pthread.h. * fixincl.x: Regenerate. * tests/base/pthread.h: Adjust. Patches: http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/fixincludes/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gccr1=1.33r2=1.34 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/fixincludes/inclhack.def.diff?cvsroot=gccr1=1.17r2=1.18 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/fixincludes/fixincl.x.diff?cvsroot=gccr1=1.17r2=1.18 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/fixincludes/tests/base/pthread.h.diff?cvsroot=gccr1=1.3r2=1.4 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20166
[Bug target/20166] Bootstrap failure due to lack of fixinclude of pthread problem
--- Additional Comments From rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-21 16:48 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20166
[Bug target/20166] Bootstrap failure due to lack of fixinclude of pthread problem
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-20 17:39 --- (In reply to comment #12) Patch here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-03/msg01377.html Note for fixinclude patches, Bruce Korb likes to be CCed on them. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20166
[Bug target/20166] Bootstrap failure due to lack of fixinclude of pthread problem
--- Additional Comments From rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-15 08:15 --- Patch here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-03/msg01377.html -- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org |org Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Keywords||patch Last reconfirmed|2005-02-28 18:28:48 |2005-03-15 08:15:47 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20166
[Bug target/20166] Bootstrap failure due to lack of fixinclude of pthread problem
--- Additional Comments From jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-11 11:51 --- Just FYI, most distributions ship LinuxThreads headers by default and you need to specifically ask for NPTL headers ATM. Linking happens against LinuxThreads libraries as well by default, though NPTL is the default threading library at runtime. This is the setup e.g. Fedora Core, RHEL, SUSE, Mandrake, Conectiva use. So the problem is not that wide-spread. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20166
[Bug target/20166] Bootstrap failure due to lack of fixinclude of pthread problem
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-11 03:29 --- I've restored the target milestone for this bug, but made the priority P3. I think that it would be good to fix this bug, since these GLIBCs are out there in the wild. The right fix is indded to add that to fixincludes. Richard, Greg, would one of you like to give that a try? -- What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P3 Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20166
[Bug target/20166] Bootstrap failure due to lack of fixinclude of pthread problem
--- Additional Comments From rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-01 16:01 --- We really need to fix this for 4.0.0 -- What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |critical Priority|P2 |P1 Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20166
[Bug target/20166] Bootstrap failure due to lack of fixinclude of pthread problem
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-01 17:05 --- Well considering this is glibc bug, yes this needs to be fixed but really glibc should have this code in the first place as it would break with -pedantic and they were using an undocumented extension. -- What|Removed |Added Severity|critical|normal Priority|P1 |P2 Target Milestone|4.0.0 |--- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20166
[Bug target/20166] Bootstrap failure due to lack of fixinclude of pthread problem
--- Additional Comments From themis_hv at yahoo dot co dot uk 2005-03-01 19:33 --- Yes, glibc should have this code in the first place but we can not turn the clock back/time travel. Futhermore, I can reproduce it on i686-pc-linux-gnu with NPTL-enabled glibc-2.3.3 system using official tarball with no patches. IMHO, it's quite important for folks using NPTL-enabled systems to bootstrap GCC 4.0. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20166
[Bug target/20166] Bootstrap failure due to lack of fixinclude of pthread problem
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-28 18:28 --- (In reply to comment #4) (In reply to comment #1) It is not just debian but anyone who used a bad glibc in the first place. I have no idea when this was introduced at all. It was introduced by fix for GCC Bug ID 19333 I mean in glibc, as I have much older glibc and it works still. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-02-28 18:28:48 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20166
[Bug target/20166] Bootstrap failure due to lack of fixinclude of pthread problem
--- Additional Comments From themis_hv at yahoo dot co dot uk 2005-02-28 20:47 --- For NPTL addon for glibc, it's been their since 12 April 2003, see http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/libc/nptl/sysdeps/pthread/pthread.h?cvsroot=glibc -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20166
[Bug target/20166] Bootstrap failure due to lack of fixinclude of pthread problem
--- Additional Comments From themis_hv at yahoo dot co dot uk 2005-02-24 08:18 --- (In reply to comment #1) It is not just debian but anyone who used a bad glibc in the first place. I have no idea when this was introduced at all. It was introduced by fix for GCC Bug ID 19333 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20166
[Bug target/20166] Bootstrap failure due to lack of fixinclude of pthread problem
-- What|Removed |Added CC||themis_hv at yahoo dot co ||dot uk http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20166
[Bug target/20166] Bootstrap failure due to lack of fixinclude of pthread problem
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-23 15:01 --- It is not just debian but anyone who used a bad glibc in the first place. I have no idea when this was introduced at all. -- What|Removed |Added Component|bootstrap |target Keywords||build http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20166
[Bug target/20166] Bootstrap failure due to lack of fixinclude of pthread problem
--- Additional Comments From gschafer at zip dot com dot au 2005-02-24 04:39 --- This also happens for me on i686-pc-linux-gnu. It's a bog-standard unpatched NPTL-enabled glibc-2.3.4 system. I don't think it classifies as a bad glibc. I concur that some fixincludes magic may be required here. This is a showstopper. -- What|Removed |Added CC||gschafer at zip dot com dot ||au http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20166
[Bug target/20166] Bootstrap failure due to lack of fixinclude of pthread problem
--- Additional Comments From gschafer at zip dot com dot au 2005-02-24 06:43 --- Here's the fix to pthread.h from Glibc cvs. I suppose the fixinclude fix would need to replicate this: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/glibc-cvs/2005-q1/msg00303.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20166
