[Bug target/20294] ia64 gcj failures

2006-01-16 Thread tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #2 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-01-17 01:20 ---
Andrew, is this still happening with 4.1?


-- 

tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||tromey at gcc dot gnu dot
   ||org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20294



[Bug target/20294] ia64 gcj failures

2006-01-16 Thread overholt at redhat dot com


--- Comment #3 from overholt at redhat dot com  2006-01-17 01:38 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
 Andrew, is this still happening with 4.1?

No.  Sorry I didn't close this already.

I successfully built Eclipse (natively-compiled) on ia64 last week.

Marking WORKSFORME.


-- 

overholt at redhat dot com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||WORKSFORME


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20294



[Bug target/20294] ia64 gcj failures

2005-03-04 Thread aph at gcc dot gnu dot org


-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|aph at gcc dot gnu dot org  |unassigned at gcc dot gnu
   ||dot org
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20294


[Bug target/20294] ia64 gcj failures

2005-03-02 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-03-03 
02:43 ---
This is a target bug. Either a binutils one which I really doubt it, or a 
back-end bug which looks more 
likely.

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
   ||org
  Component|java|target


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20294