[Bug target/23240] gcc.c-torture/execute/pr23135.c execution fails

2005-10-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23240

[Bug target/23240] gcc.c-torture/execute/pr23135.c execution fails

2005-10-12 Thread wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #5 from wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-10-12 23:49 ---
This fails in the 20051005 testsuite results
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-10/msg00197.html
but not the 20051006 testsuite results
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-10/msg00240.html

This was presumably fixed by Steve Ellcey's patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-10/msg00221.html

Closing as fixed.


-- 

wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23240

[Bug target/23240] gcc.c-torture/execute/pr23135.c execution fails

2005-09-08 Thread sje at cup dot hp dot com 

--- Additional Comments From sje at cup dot hp dot com  2005-09-08 16:34 
---
This test uses vectors.  It looks like the vector code for IA64 was written and
tested on Linux (which is little-endian) and this test fails on HP-UX which is
big-endian.  The program below prints '1500 1300' on Linux but prints '1300
1500' on HP-UX.  I think endianness was not considered somewhere in the vector
code but I am not sure where.



typedef int __attribute__((vector_size (8))) vecint;
typedef int __attribute__((mode(SI))) siint;

vecint i = { 150, 100 };
vecint j = { 10, 13 };
vecint k;

union {
  vecint v;
  siint i[2];
} res;

int
main ()
{
  vecint k0, k1, k2, k3, k4, k5, k6, k7;

  k1 = i * j;
  res.v = k1;

  printf("%d %d\n", res.i[0], res.i[1]);

  exit (0);
}

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23240

[Bug target/23240] gcc.c-torture/execute/pr23135.c execution fails

2005-08-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-08-10 
12:12 ---
Confirmed.

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Ever Confirmed||1
   Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-08-10 12:12:05
   date||


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23240

[Bug target/23240] gcc.c-torture/execute/pr23135.c execution fails

2005-08-05 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-08-05 
16:51 ---
Hmm, does this work now after PR 23135 was fixed?

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23240

[Bug target/23240] gcc.c-torture/execute/pr23135.c execution fails

2005-08-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-08-04 
21:56 ---
This looks like a target issue.

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

  Component|tree-optimization   |target
 GCC target triplet||ia64-hp-hpux11.23
   Keywords||wrong-code


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23240