[Bug target/25920] after compiled with -pg for profiling, all the spec2kfp cases failed at runtime

2006-09-12 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-09-13 06:02 ---
No feedback in 3 months so closing.


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
 Resolution||INVALID


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25920

[Bug target/25920] after compiled with -pg for profiling, all the spec2kfp cases failed at runtime

2006-06-05 Thread sje at cup dot hp dot com 


--- Comment #4 from sje at cup dot hp dot com  2006-06-05 18:22 ---
It doesn't look like we have gotten a simple test case for this.  Is it time to
close it out as a duplicate of PR 12455.  Handong Yeh, have you tried this with
a 4.1 (or later) GCC?


-- 

sje at cup dot hp dot com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||sje at cup dot hp dot com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25920

[Bug target/25920] after compiled with -pg for profiling, all the spec2kfp cases failed at runtime

2006-01-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-01-23 14:33 ---
Related to PR 12455 which was fixed in 4.1.0.


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  BugsThisDependsOn||12455


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25920

[Bug target/25920] after compiled with -pg for profiling, all the spec2kfp cases failed at runtime

2006-02-20 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-02-20 19:08 ---
Is there a simple testcase?


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25920