[Bug target/28102] [4.2/4.3 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

2008-02-01 Thread jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #27 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-02-01 16:53 ---
4.2.3 is being released now, changing milestones of open bugs to 4.2.4.


-- 

jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.2.3   |4.2.4


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28102

[Bug target/28102] [4.2/4.3 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

2007-12-27 Thread ojab at ojab dot ru 


--- Comment #25 from ojab at ojab dot ru  2007-12-27 17:17 ---
Is it any progress?


-- 

ojab at ojab dot ru changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ojab at ojab dot ru


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28102

[Bug target/28102] [4.2/4.3 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

2007-12-27 Thread tschwinge at gnu dot org 


--- Comment #26 from tschwinge at gnu dot org  2007-12-27 18:23 ---
Here is what I proposed / asked:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2007-11/msg00289.html

Unfortunately I didn't get a definitive answer.  I did not yet start to
implement the ideas I described.  I don't know if such a patch would finally be
applied to the GCC repository.

In the mean time I'm using these patches:
http://www.schwinge.homeip.net/~thomas/tmp/gcc-patches/


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28102

[Bug target/28102] [4.2/4.3 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

2007-11-04 Thread samuel dot thibault at ens-lyon dot org 


--- Comment #24 from samuel dot thibault at ens-lyon dot org  2007-11-04 
16:42 ---
It's rather the converse: Linux is much like Hurd, since they're both
GNU-based, so quite logically they should share most of the configuration
stuff. 


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28102

[Bug target/28102] [4.2/4.3 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

2007-10-09 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #23 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-10-09 19:22 
---
Change target milestone to 4.2.3, as 4.2.2 has been released.


-- 

mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.2.2   |4.2.3


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28102

[Bug target/28102] [4.2/4.3 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

2007-10-01 Thread aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #20 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-10-01 11:55 ---
Tripping exactly this while thinking about uclibc on hurd.

To me it looks like linux.h shouldn't be included and gnu.h should be made
uclibc-aware..


-- 

aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28102

[Bug target/28102] [4.2/4.3 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

2007-10-01 Thread ams at gnu dot org 


--- Comment #21 from ams at gnu dot org  2007-10-01 18:04 ---
Subject: Re:  [4.2/4.3 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC'
undeclared

   To me it looks like linux.h shouldn't be included

It should be included.

   and gnu.h should be made uclibc-aware..

This would be nice, would you like to do that?  I have far to much to
handle right now.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28102

Re: [Bug target/28102] [4.2/4.3 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

2007-10-01 Thread Andrew Pinski 
On 1 Oct 2007 18:04:09 -, ams at gnu dot org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 --- Comment #21 from ams at gnu dot org  2007-10-01 18:04 ---
 Subject: Re:  [4.2/4.3 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC'
 undeclared

To me it looks like linux.h shouldn't be included

 It should be included.

Again why?  You still have not explained why HURD is Linux?  Because
as far as I can tell it is not.

-- Pinski

[Bug target/28102] [4.2/4.3 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

2007-10-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #22 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-10-01 18:36 
---
Subject: Re:  [4.2/4.3 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC'
undeclared

On 1 Oct 2007 18:04:09 -, ams at gnu dot org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 --- Comment #21 from ams at gnu dot org  2007-10-01 18:04 ---
 Subject: Re:  [4.2/4.3 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC'
 undeclared

To me it looks like linux.h shouldn't be included

 It should be included.

Again why?  You still have not explained why HURD is Linux?  Because
as far as I can tell it is not.

-- Pinski


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28102

[Bug target/28102] [4.2/4.3 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

2007-07-19 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 


-- 

mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.2.1   |4.2.2


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28102

[Bug target/28102] [4.2/4.3 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

2007-05-14 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #19 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-05-14 22:28 
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.


-- 

mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.2.0   |4.2.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28102