[Bug target/28137] make check gets 10 FAIL reports with gcc.dg/c99-typespec-1.c

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-09-03 07:30 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
 (In reply to comment #4)
  FAIL: gcc.dg/visibility-11.c scan-assembler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Yes this one is known.
And that was fixed by:
2006-07-24  Uros Bizjak  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* gcc.dg/visibility-11.c: Enlarge test array to 1024 bytes to
avoid memcpy optimization.


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED
   Target Milestone|--- |4.1.2


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28137

[Bug target/28137] make check gets 10 FAIL reports with gcc.dg/c99-typespec-1.c

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-06-29 00:30 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
 FAIL: gcc.dg/visibility-11.c scan-assembler [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Yes this one is known.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28137

[Bug target/28137] make check gets 10 FAIL reports with gcc.dg/c99-typespec-1.c

[duncan_roe at acslink dot net dot au]

--- Comment #4 from duncan_roe at acslink dot net dot au  2006-06-25 05:53 
---
HJ's patch can still be applied to expect-5.43 (but I wasted some time before I
realised you must use --ignore-whitespace). This *does* reduce the number of
errors reported, but one error remains:

FAIL: gcc.dg/visibility-11.c scan-assembler [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Also make check seemed to test more things when I changed ARCH from amd64 to
x86_64. So now the config line is:
ARCH=x86_64
SRC=/usr/src/gcc-4.1.1
ARCH=${ARCH:-i486}
TARGET=${TARGET:-$ARCH-pc-linux-gnu}
$SRC/configure \
  --prefix=/usr/local64/gcc402 \
  --enable-shared \
  --enable-threads=posix \
  --enable-__cxa_atexit \
  --disable-checking \
  --with-gnu-ld \
  --target=${TARGET} \
  --host=${TARGET} \
  --build=${TARGET}

I guess amd64 should not be used then?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28137

[Bug target/28137] make check gets 10 FAIL reports with gcc.dg/c99-typespec-1.c

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-06-22 12:36 ---
FAIL: gcc.dg/c99-typespec-1.c (test for excess errors)

Sounds like there is an ICE going on.


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Component|c   |target


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28137

[Bug target/28137] make check gets 10 FAIL reports with gcc.dg/c99-typespec-1.c

[joseph at codesourcery dot com]

--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com  2006-06-22 14:27 ---
Subject: Re:  make check gets 10 FAIL reports with
 gcc.dg/c99-typespec-1.c

On Thu, 22 Jun 2006, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:

 FAIL: gcc.dg/c99-typespec-1.c (test for excess errors)
 
 Sounds like there is an ICE going on.

It sounds to me a lot move like someone using a version of expect without 
HJ's patch (bug 12096).


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28137

[Bug target/28137] make check gets 10 FAIL reports with gcc.dg/c99-typespec-1.c

[duncan_roe at acslink dot net dot au]

--- Comment #3 from duncan_roe at acslink dot net dot au  2006-06-22 21:21 
---
I have expect 5.41. HJ's patch is not yet accepted by the expect folks - they
believe the problem may have its roots in Tcl.
So I will try applying the patch and re-running make check.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28137