[Bug target/29338] [4.1 regression] ICE on valid C++ code

2006-10-18 Thread debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org


--- Comment #5 from debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org  2006-10-18 
07:35 ---
works with 4.1 4.1.2 20061015, closing.

  Matthias


-- 

debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29338



[Bug target/29338] [4.1 regression] ICE on valid C++ code

2006-10-07 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-10-08 02:05 ---
Works on
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gcc]$ ./xgcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: arm-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../configure --target=arm-linux-gnu : (reconfigured)
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.2.0 20061007 (experimenta


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Known to work|4.0.4   |4.0.4 4.2.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29338



[Bug target/29338] [4.1 regression] ICE on valid C++ code

2006-10-07 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-10-08 02:13 ---
Works with:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gcc]$ ./xgcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: arm-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../configure --target=arm-linux-gnu
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.1.2 20061007 (prerelease)


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29338



[Bug target/29338] [4.1 regression] ICE on valid C++ code

2006-10-03 Thread debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org


--- Comment #1 from debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org  2006-10-03 
23:36 ---
Created an attachment (id=12381)
 -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12381action=view)
preprocessed source


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29338



[Bug target/29338] [4.1 regression] ICE on valid C++ code

2006-10-03 Thread debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org


--- Comment #2 from debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org  2006-10-04 
00:06 ---
the file compiles when omitting -finline-limit=1200

  Matthias


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29338