[Bug target/32552] [4.3 Regression] Runtime failure in SPEC CPU2000 benchmark fma3d and applu

2007-09-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #15 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-09-12 21:21 ---
H.J. committed this earlier today:
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=128409


-- 

jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32552



[Bug target/32552] [4.3 Regression] Runtime failure in SPEC CPU2000 benchmark fma3d and applu

2007-09-11 Thread wilson at specifix dot com


--- Comment #14 from wilson at specifix dot com  2007-09-11 22:32 ---
Subject: Re:  [4.3 Regression] Runtime failure in SPEC
CPU2000 benchmark fma3d and applu

On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 09:44 +, jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> I have bootstrapped/regtested the
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13831&action=view
> patch on ia64-linux, fixed the
> FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr28003.C execution test
> failure, no regressions.   

I'm certainly happy with the patch I wrote, I just never got around to
testing it.  Since you have tested it, it is OK to install.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32552



[Bug target/32552] [4.3 Regression] Runtime failure in SPEC CPU2000 benchmark fma3d and applu

2007-09-11 Thread wilson at specifix dot com


--- Comment #13 from wilson at specifix dot com  2007-09-11 22:31 ---
Subject: Re:  [4.3 Regression] Runtime failure in SPEC
CPU2000 benchmark fma3d and applu

On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 12:05 +, jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> So, what can be done to speed up acceptance of this?

I need more time for FSF gcc work, and fewer problems that interfere
with my FSF work, but unfortunately that isn't something you can fix.
My latest problem, both my laptop and my internet connection failed on
the same weekend, making it rather difficult to get any work done.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32552



[Bug target/32552] [4.3 Regression] Runtime failure in SPEC CPU2000 benchmark fma3d and applu

2007-09-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #12 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-09-05 09:44 ---
I have bootstrapped/regtested the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13831&action=view
patch on ia64-linux, fixed the
FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr28003.C execution test
failure, no regressions.   


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32552



[Bug target/32552] [4.3 Regression] Runtime failure in SPEC CPU2000 benchmark fma3d and applu

2007-09-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #11 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-09-05 09:41 ---
*** Bug 32855 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


-- 

jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||hjl at lucon dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32552



[Bug target/32552] [4.3 Regression] Runtime failure in SPEC CPU2000 benchmark fma3d and applu

2007-09-04 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org


-- 

mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Priority|P3  |P1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32552



[Bug target/32552] [4.3 Regression] Runtime failure in SPEC CPU2000 benchmark fma3d and applu

2007-09-04 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #10 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-09-05 01:28 
---
To answer Jakub's question: 

> So, what can be done to speed up acceptance of this?

Jim is a GWP maintainer, so once he's happy the patch can go in.  Testing on
IA64 definitely seems like a good step. :-)


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32552



[Bug target/32552] [4.3 Regression] Runtime failure in SPEC CPU2000 benchmark fma3d and applu

2007-08-27 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #9 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-08-27 12:05 ---
Sounds like a dup of PR32855.
The patch in comment #7 certainly fixes that.

So, what can be done to speed up acceptance of this?
I can try to bootstrap/regtest on ia64-linux this later today, only arm in
addition to ia64 defines TARGET_UNWIND_INFO and arm.h defines
DWARF2_UNWIND_INFO 1, so the defaults.h change shouldn't affect arm at all.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32552



[Bug target/32552] [4.3 Regression] Runtime failure in SPEC CPU2000 benchmark fma3d and applu

2007-08-24 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-08-24 14:37 ---
Confirmed.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot
   ||org
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Ever Confirmed|0   |1
   GCC host triplet|ia64-linux-gnu  |
 GCC target triplet||ia64-linux-gnu
   Keywords||wrong-code
   Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2007-08-24 14:37:01
   date||
Summary|Runtime failure in SPEC |[4.3 Regression] Runtime
   |CPU2000 benchmark fma3d and |failure in SPEC CPU2000
   |applu   |benchmark fma3d and applu
   Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32552