[Bug target/40786] Windows %I32 format confusion

2009-10-30 Thread ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #9 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-10-30 17:52 ---
Well, I meant of course 4.4 branch. I won't backport this. So I closed this
bug.


-- 

ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40786

[Bug target/40786] Windows %I32 format confusion

2009-08-24 Thread ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #8 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-08-24 06:20 ---
Patch fixed for 4.5 at revision 151047.

I would like to backport this patch to 4.4 and possibly to 4.3 branch, too?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40786

[Bug target/40786] Windows %I32 format confusion

2009-08-23 Thread ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 


-- 

ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu   |ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot
   |dot org |org
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40786

[Bug target/40786] Windows %I32 format confusion

2009-08-21 Thread ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #4 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-08-21 19:22 ---
As to see on Wiki
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printf#printf_format_placeholders

%I32 means, for integer types, causes to expect a 32-bit (double word) integer
argument. May tests have shown that long type and int type arguments are valid
here.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40786

[Bug target/40786] Windows %I32 format confusion

2009-08-18 Thread ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #3 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-08-18 11:32 ---
Is there a way to make %I32 accepting both types?
Something like FMT_LEN_z?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40786

[Bug target/40786] Windows %I32 format confusion

2009-07-19 Thread ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #1 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-07-19 08:55 ---
I agree, that the behavior isn't correct here. %I32 is treated at the moment as
equivalent for %l width specifier. But in fact is the type __int32 specifying
an integer scalar with 32-bit width. For x86 and x64, where
sizeof(long)==sizeof(int), the %I32 should be valid for both, or just for
integer. That it is interpreted as equivalent to %l is indeed a bug.

Cheers,
Kai


-- 

ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Ever Confirmed|0   |1
   Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2009-07-19 08:55:12
   date||


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40786

[Bug target/40786] Windows %I32 format confusion

2009-07-19 Thread sezeroz at gmail dot com 


--- Comment #2 from sezeroz at gmail dot com  2009-07-19 09:33 ---
Problem also exists in 4.4.0/4.4.1.


-- 

sezeroz at gmail dot com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||sezeroz at gmail dot com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40786