[Bug target/41999] Bug in generation of interrupt function code for ARM processor

[wilco at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41999

Wilco  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 CC||wilco at gcc dot gnu.org
 Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME

--- Comment #4 from Wilco  ---
Works since at least GCC4.5.4.

[Bug target/41999] Bug in generation of interrupt function code for ARM processor

[domen at cba dot si]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41999

Domen Puncer  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||domen at cba dot si

--- Comment #3 from Domen Puncer  2011-06-16 08:23:25 UTC 
---
FWIW, this and 45540 don't happen on gcc 4.5.2 anymore (confirmed that it DOES
happen on 2010q1-188 4.4.1):

irq_:
@ Interrupt Service Routine.
@ args = 0, pretend = 0, frame = 0
@ frame_needed = 0, uses_anonymous_args = 0
sublr, lr, #4
stmfdsp!, {r0, r1, r2, r3, r4, r5, ip, lr}
ldrr4, .L2
ldrr0, [r4, #0]
blexternal
ldrr0, [r4, #0]
movr3, r0, asl #1
movr0, r3
strr3, [r4, #0]
blexternal
ldmfdsp!, {r0, r1, r2, r3, r4, r5, ip, pc}^
.L3:
.align2
.L2:
.word.LANCHOR0
.sizeirq_, .-irq_
.bss
.align2
.set.LANCHOR0,. + 0
.typecnt, %object
.sizecnt, 4
cnt:
.space4
.ident"GCC: (Sourcery G++ Lite 2011.03-42) 4.5.2"

[Bug target/41999] Bug in generation of interrupt function code for ARM processor

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-09-05 06:41 ---
*** Bug 45540 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ethan at evolution dot com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41999

[Bug target/41999] Bug in generation of interrupt function code for ARM processor

[ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #1 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-11-16 10:18 ---
Confirmed. 


-- 

ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Ever Confirmed|0   |1
   Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2009-11-16 10:18:39
   date||


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41999