[Bug target/46883] GCC ICE with error: unrecognizable insn

2012-06-22 Thread ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46883

Ramana Radhakrishnan  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED
   Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0

--- Comment #8 from Ramana Radhakrishnan  2012-06-22 
10:40:23 UTC ---
 Marking as fixed as I can see it fixed with 4.6.0 release , 4.6 branch, 4.7
branch and trunk.


[Bug target/46883] GCC ICE with error: unrecognizable insn

2011-04-28 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46883

Richard Guenther  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.6.1   |---


[Bug target/46883] GCC ICE with error: unrecognizable insn

2011-03-25 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46883

Jakub Jelinek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.6.0   |4.6.1

--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek  2011-03-25 
19:53:23 UTC ---
GCC 4.6.0 is being released, adjusting target milestone.


[Bug target/46883] GCC ICE with error: unrecognizable insn

2011-01-06 Thread rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46883

Richard Earnshaw  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #6 from Richard Earnshaw  2011-01-06 
11:02:32 UTC ---
Chung-lin, your patch has been committed.  Can this be closed now, or is there
some outstanding problem?


[Bug target/46883] GCC ICE with error: unrecognizable insn

2010-12-15 Thread cltang at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46883

--- Comment #5 from Chung-Lin Tang  2010-12-16 
05:10:23 UTC ---
Author: cltang
Date: Thu Dec 16 05:10:18 2010
New Revision: 167900

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167900
Log:
2010-12-16  Chung-Lin Tang  

PR target/46883
* config/arm/arm.md
(zero_extendhisi2 for register input splitter): Change
"register_operand" to "s_register_operand".
(zero_extendqisi2 for register input splitter): Same.

testsuite/
* gcc.target/arm/pr46883.c: New testcase.

Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr46883.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/config/arm/arm.md
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog


[Bug target/46883] GCC ICE with error: unrecognizable insn

2010-12-14 Thread cltang at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46883

Chung-Lin Tang  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||cltang at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #4 from Chung-Lin Tang  2010-12-14 
14:12:40 UTC ---
Patch posted:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-12/msg01096.html


[Bug target/46883] GCC ICE with error: unrecognizable insn

2010-12-13 Thread uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46883

Ulrich Weigand  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||bernds at codesourcery dot
   ||com, uweigand at gcc dot
   ||gnu.org

--- Comment #3 from Ulrich Weigand  2010-12-13 
18:54:48 UTC ---
Confirmed.  A somewhat shorter testcase is:

void
bar (unsigned char *q, unsigned short *data16s, int len)
{
  int i;

  for (i = 0; i < len; i++)
{
  q[2 * i] =
(((data16s[i] & 0xFF) << 8) | ((data16s[i] >> 8) & 0xFF)) & 0xFF;
  q[2 * i + 1] =
((unsigned short)
 (((data16s[i] & 0xFF) << 8) | ((data16s[i] >> 8) & 0xFF))) >> 8;
}
}

The problem seems to be that an insn:
(insn 88 86 90 4 (set (reg:SI 240)
(zero_extend:SI (subreg:QI (mem:HI (post_inc:SI (reg:SI 220 [ ivtmp.22
])) [2 MEM[(short unsigned int *)D.2066_62 + 4294967294B]+0 S2 A16]) 0)))
a.c:10 152 {*arm_zero_extendqisi2}
 (expr_list:REG_INC (reg:SI 220 [ ivtmp.22 ])
(nil)))

gets transformed by a splitter into:
(insn 122 86 90 4 (set (reg:SI 240)
(and:SI (subreg:SI (mem:HI (post_inc:SI (reg:SI 220 [ ivtmp.22 ])) [2
MEM[(short unsigned int *)D.2066_62 + 4294967294B]+0 S2 A16]) 0)
(const_int 255 [0xff]))) a.c:10 -1
 (expr_list:REG_INC (reg:SI 220 [ ivtmp.22 ])
(nil)))

But this isn't accepted by the andsi3 pattern, since the (subreg (mem ..)) does
not match the s_register_operand predicate.

The splitter
(define_split
  [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "register_operand" "")
(zero_extend:SI (match_operand:QI 1 "register_operand" "")))]
  "!arm_arch6"
  [(set (match_dup 0) (ashift:SI (match_dup 2) (const_int 24)))
   (set (match_dup 0) (lshiftrt:SI (match_dup 0) (const_int 24)))]
{
  operands[2] = simplify_gen_subreg (SImode, operands[1], QImode, 0);
  if (TARGET_ARM)
{
  emit_insn (gen_andsi3 (operands[0], operands[2], GEN_INT (255)));
  DONE;
}
})

was introduced by Bernd Schmidt's patch to improve zero- and sign-extension
handling on ARM (committed 2010-07-02), PR 42172:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-06/msg00832.html

Bernd, do you have any suggestions how to fix this?


[Bug target/46883] GCC ICE with error: unrecognizable insn

2010-12-10 Thread ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46883

Ramana Radhakrishnan  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
   Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0


[Bug target/46883] GCC ICE with error: unrecognizable insn

2010-12-10 Thread ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46883

Ramana Radhakrishnan  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
   Last reconfirmed||2010.12.10 13:25:49
 CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
 Ever Confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #2 from Ramana Radhakrishnan  2010-12-10 
13:25:49 UTC ---
This seems to appear at -march=armv5te .


[Bug target/46883] GCC ICE with error: unrecognizable insn

2010-12-10 Thread mikpe at it dot uu.se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46883

Mikael Pettersson  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se

--- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson  2010-12-10 
13:04:05 UTC ---
I see these ICEs too with gcc-4.6-20101127 on armv5tel-linux-gnueabi.