[Bug target/48789] missed ARM optimization: use LDMIA
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48789 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed||2017-06-16 Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #5 from Ramana Radhakrishnan --- Confirmed but lower priority given all the other statements in c#2
[Bug target/48789] missed ARM optimization: use LDMIA
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48789 Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-27 16:40:09 UTC --- There are a number of problems and not all of them are related to the backend. - ldm / stm aren't really first class citizens as far as GCC is concerned . There is no way today of getting the register allocator to forcefully use increasing addresses as a metric of choosing where to do what. - I suspect the performance issues you are seeing are with the number of spills and fills that are being generated in this case. If you tried -fsched-pressure life becomes much better and in fact the amount of stack space used is 0 . I haven't run any benchmarks to see if in this particular case you get better performance .
[Bug target/48789] missed ARM optimization: use LDMIA
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48789 --- Comment #3 from Török Edwin edwintorok at gmail dot com 2011-04-27 11:11:02 UTC --- Created attachment 24116 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24116 bench.c
[Bug target/48789] missed ARM optimization: use LDMIA
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48789 --- Comment #2 from Török Edwin edwintorok at gmail dot com 2011-04-27 11:10:49 UTC --- Created attachment 24115 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24115 test.S
[Bug target/48789] missed ARM optimization: use LDMIA
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48789 --- Comment #1 from Török Edwin edwintorok at gmail dot com 2011-04-27 11:10:35 UTC --- Created attachment 24114 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24114 reverse.c