[Bug target/49987] [4.7 Regression] gcc.c-torture/compile/pr34856.c fails on powerpc-darwin9 from r176228
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49987 rsand...@gcc.gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #13 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-03 08:38:41 UTC --- Fixed on trunk. Thanks for the help with the testing.
[Bug target/49987] [4.7 Regression] gcc.c-torture/compile/pr34856.c fails on powerpc-darwin9 from r176228
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49987 --- Comment #12 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-02 13:32:14 UTC --- Author: rsandifo Date: Fri Sep 2 13:32:10 2011 New Revision: 178474 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=178474 Log: gcc/ PR target/49987 * config/rs6000/rs6000.c (paired_expand_vector_init): Check for valid CONST_VECTOR operands. (rs6000_expand_vector_init): Likewise. Modified: trunk/gcc/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c
[Bug target/49987] [4.7 Regression] gcc.c-torture/compile/pr34856.c fails on powerpc-darwin9 from r176228
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49987 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh at redhat dot com, ||dje.gcc at gmail dot com, ||pthaugen at us dot ibm.com --- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-08-29 08:58:26 UTC --- Note that while gcc.c-torture/compile/pr34856.c does not fail on powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu, gcc.dg/pr34856.c does (see http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-08/msg03221.html ). Could a user of powerpc*-linux-* try the patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-08/msg01861.html ?
[Bug target/49987] [4.7 Regression] gcc.c-torture/compile/pr34856.c fails on powerpc-darwin9 from r176228
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49987 Pat Haugen pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #11 from Pat Haugen pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-30 01:11:37 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) Note that while gcc.c-torture/compile/pr34856.c does not fail on powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu, gcc.dg/pr34856.c does (see http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-08/msg03221.html ). Could a user of powerpc*-linux-* try the patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-08/msg01861.html ? Yes, the patch applied to trunk fixes the ICE on gcc.dg/pr34856.c. Note that -maltivec is required to produce the error, which gcc.c-torture/compile/pr34856.c doesn't specify so that is why it didn't fail the same way.
[Bug target/49987] [4.7 Regression] gcc.c-torture/compile/pr34856.c fails on powerpc-darwin9 from r176228
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49987 --- Comment #8 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-19 08:31:43 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) (In reply to comment #6) Created attachment 24987 [details] Revised patch Sorry, seems there are two copies of the logic. Please try this instead. yes, works for me off a stage3 bubble - not tested any other case yet tho. Thanks. Would you be able to run a full bootstrap and regression test with it? I'll submit the patch if that succeeds.
[Bug target/49987] [4.7 Regression] gcc.c-torture/compile/pr34856.c fails on powerpc-darwin9 from r176228
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49987 --- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-08-19 09:40:18 UTC --- Would you be able to run a full bootstrap and regression test with it? I'll submit the patch if that succeeds. I have done a clean bootstrap of revision 177878 with the patch in comment #6. AFAICT the patch does not introduce any regression although I had to hunt some new failures due to revision 177691 (I'll submit a pr later today).
[Bug target/49987] [4.7 Regression] gcc.c-torture/compile/pr34856.c fails on powerpc-darwin9 from r176228
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49987 rsand...@gcc.gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org |gnu.org | --- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-11 12:04:14 UTC --- Mine
[Bug target/49987] [4.7 Regression] gcc.c-torture/compile/pr34856.c fails on powerpc-darwin9 from r176228
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49987 --- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-11 12:13:02 UTC --- Created attachment 24975 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24975 Proposed patch I think the PowerPC backend needs the same fix as i386 and spu did for #34856. Could you try the attached patch?
[Bug target/49987] [4.7 Regression] gcc.c-torture/compile/pr34856.c fails on powerpc-darwin9 from r176228
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49987 --- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-11 12:23:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) Created attachment 24975 [details] Proposed patch I think the PowerPC backend needs the same fix as i386 and spu did for #34856. Could you try the attached patch? will do - machine tied up for a few hours - back to you later.
[Bug target/49987] [4.7 Regression] gcc.c-torture/compile/pr34856.c fails on powerpc-darwin9 from r176228
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49987 --- Comment #5 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-11 20:07:00 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) (In reply to comment #3) Created attachment 24975 [details] Proposed patch I think the PowerPC backend needs the same fix as i386 and spu did for #34856. Could you try the attached patch? will do - machine tied up for a few hours - back to you later. unfortunately, not ; the error is unchanged: Executing on host: /Volumes/ScratchCS/gcc-4-7-trunk-build/gcc/xgcc -B/Volumes/ScratchCS/gcc-4-7-trunk-build/gcc/ -O1 -w -c -m32 -o pr34856.o /GCC/g cc-live-trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr34856.c(timeout = 60) /GCC/gcc-live-trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr34856.c: In function 'f1': /GCC/gcc-live-trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr34856.c:17:1: internal compiler error: in simplify_immed_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:5255
[Bug target/49987] [4.7 Regression] gcc.c-torture/compile/pr34856.c fails on powerpc-darwin9 from r176228
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49987 rsand...@gcc.gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #24975|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #6 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-11 20:23:29 UTC --- Created attachment 24987 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24987 Revised patch Sorry, seems there are two copies of the logic. Please try this instead.
[Bug target/49987] [4.7 Regression] gcc.c-torture/compile/pr34856.c fails on powerpc-darwin9 from r176228
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49987 --- Comment #7 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-11 20:59:51 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) Created attachment 24987 [details] Revised patch Sorry, seems there are two copies of the logic. Please try this instead. yes, works for me off a stage3 bubble - not tested any other case yet tho.
[Bug target/49987] [4.7 Regression] gcc.c-torture/compile/pr34856.c fails on powerpc-darwin9 from r176228
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49987 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed||2011.08.08 10:03:45 Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-08-08 10:03:45 UTC --- Also FAIL: gcc.dg/pr34856.c (internal compiler error) FAIL: gcc.dg/pr34856.c (test for excess errors)
[Bug target/49987] [4.7 Regression] gcc.c-torture/compile/pr34856.c fails on powerpc-darwin9 from r176228
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49987 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
