[Bug target/54308] [4.8 regression] build regression in 190498 on ppc64/linux: legitimate_indirect_address_p undefined
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54308 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-11-08 20:19:00 UTC --- Fixed.
[Bug target/54308] [4.8 regression] build regression in 190498 on ppc64/linux: legitimate_indirect_address_p undefined
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54308 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-11-08 20:09:20 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Nov 8 20:09:14 2012 New Revision: 193336 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193336 Log: PR target/54308 * config/rs6000/rs6000.c (legitimate_indirect_address_p): Remove inline keyword. Modified: trunk/gcc/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c
[Bug target/54308] [4.8 regression] build regression in 190498 on ppc64/linux: legitimate_indirect_address_p undefined
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54308 --- Comment #8 from Paul H. Hargrove 2012-08-20 08:57:29 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) [...] > Ok, but see comment 4; try just removing the "inline" there. If necessary, > the > inline can be wrapped in some #ifdef construct. It depends on the maintainer > to deem it acceptable of course. I tried removing the "inline" keyword as suggested, from revision 190524 if it matters. I then attempted to build stage1 using gcc-4.1.2, just as I had originally. I was able to build stage w/o any problems with just that 1-word change.
[Bug target/54308] [4.8 regression] build regression in 190498 on ppc64/linux: legitimate_indirect_address_p undefined
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54308 --- Comment #7 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2012-08-19 18:29:27 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > I was unable to build 4.1.2-27.fc7 from the SRPM. I'm not sure it would have helped, seeing as the breakage was in rs6000-specific parts. > So, I've given up on finding the lowest supported compiler. Ok, but see comment 4; try just removing the "inline" there. If necessary, the inline can be wrapped in some #ifdef construct. It depends on the maintainer to deem it acceptable of course.
[Bug target/54308] [4.8 regression] build regression in 190498 on ppc64/linux: legitimate_indirect_address_p undefined
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54308 --- Comment #6 from Paul H. Hargrove 2012-08-18 19:05:19 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5 by Gary Funck) [...] > FYI, the failing system has Redhat Release 8 (circa 2002). Fedocra Core 8 > didn't come out until circa 2007. Thus, it would be surprising that an FC8 > RPM > will build on the much older RH8 system. Gary, You are confusing my two failing systems. This bug report is for a ppc64 system running FC6, making the F8 suggestion reasonable. The RH8 system is an x86 and only made it to the discuss list, not a full bug report. H-P, I was unable to build 4.1.2-27.fc7 from the SRPM. So, I've given up on finding the lowest supported compiler. -Paul
[Bug target/54308] [4.8 regression] build regression in 190498 on ppc64/linux: legitimate_indirect_address_p undefined
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54308
--- Comment #5 from Gary Funck 2012-08-18 18:39:42
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> (Note, apparent s/4.2.1/4.1.2/g in initial description.)
>
> I'd suggest updating to just a later gcc build, if you can find *only slightly
> newer* rpm:s; as for a x86_64-linux F 8 with gcc-4.1.2-33 ("gcc (GCC) 4.1.2
> 20070925 (Red Hat 4.1.2-33)"), I'm well into stage 1 for r190498.
FYI, the failing system has Redhat Release 8 (circa 2002). Fedocra Core 8
didn't come out until circa 2007. Thus, it would be surprising that an FC8 RPM
will build on the much older RH8 system.
