[Bug target/89451] [9 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr79315.f90 -O (internal compiler error)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89451 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #12 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- In fact it looks like the problem is gone at r269173 (probably fixed by r269127).
[Bug target/89451] [9 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr79315.f90 -O (internal compiler error)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89451 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #11 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #10) > Does it fail without --with-arch=haswell if you add -march=haswell by hand? Yes, it does. Further investigation seems to indicate that the problem is related to AVX: Compiling the test case results in an ICE when adding -mavx or -march=sandybridge, but not with -msse4.2 or -march=westmere.
[Bug target/89451] [9 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr79315.f90 -O (internal compiler error)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89451 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to janus from comment #8) > In fact I only see the problem when configuring with --with-arch=haswell. It > goes away if I remove that flag. Does it fail without --with-arch=haswell if you add -march=haswell by hand?
[Bug target/89451] [9 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr79315.f90 -O (internal compiler error)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89451 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Component|fortran |target --- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig --- (In reply to janus from comment #8) > In fact I only see the problem when configuring with --with-arch=haswell. It > goes away if I remove that flag. Looks like a target regression then, which Fortran just happens to expose. Moving component to TARGET.
