[Bug target/96372] [11 regression] arm/ivopts.c fails since r11-2012

[akrl at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96372

akrl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

--- Comment #5 from akrl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Yes AFAIK it is, closing thanks.

[Bug target/96372] [11 regression] arm/ivopts.c fails since r11-2012

[ramana at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96372

Ramana Radhakrishnan  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan  ---
Is this now fixed ?

[Bug target/96372] [11 regression] arm/ivopts.c fails since r11-2012

[cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96372

--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits  ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrea Corallo :

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0568f801effcea6f4e066c40bc346513d6b946c5

commit r11-6836-g0568f801effcea6f4e066c40bc346513d6b946c5
Author: Andrea Corallo 
Date:   Fri Jan 15 15:34:19 2021 +0100

arm: [testuiste] Fix ivopts.c target test [PR96372]

gcc/
2021-01-15  Andrea Corallo  
PR target/96372
* doc/sourcebuild.texi (arm_thumb2_no_arm_v8_1_lob): Document.

gcc/testsuite/
2021-01-15  Andrea Corallo  
PR target/96372
* lib/target-supports.exp
(check_effective_target_arm_thumb2_no_arm_v8_1_lob): Define proc.
* gcc.target/arm/ivopts.c: Use target
'arm_thumb2_no_arm_v8_1_lob'.

[Bug target/96372] [11 regression] arm/ivopts.c fails since r11-2012

[akrl at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96372

akrl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Priority|P3  |P2

[Bug target/96372] [11 regression] arm/ivopts.c fails since r11-2012

[akrl at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96372

akrl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Priority|P1  |P3

[Bug target/96372] [11 regression] arm/ivopts.c fails since r11-2012

[andrea.corallo at arm dot com via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96372

--- Comment #2 from Andrea Corallo  ---
I see what's going on, originally this object-size text <= 20 test was
gated with target 'arm_thumb2'.

My patch to exclude LOB targets replaced that with
'arm_thumb2_ok_no_arm_v8_1_lob', unfortunatelly this is relying on
'arm_thumb2_ok' that has a different semantic compared to the original
'arm_thumb2'.

I'll post the patch I'm testing.  Looks nothing serious to me tho.

  Andrea

Re: [Bug target/96372] [11 regression] arm/ivopts.c fails since r11-2012

[Andrea Corallo via Gcc-bugs]

I see what's going on, originally this object-size text <= 20 test was
gated with target 'arm_thumb2'.

My patch to exclude LOB targets replaced that with
'arm_thumb2_ok_no_arm_v8_1_lob', unfortunatelly this is relying on
'arm_thumb2_ok' that has a different semantic compared to the original
'arm_thumb2'.

I'll post the patch I'm testing.  Looks nothing serious to me tho.

  Andrea

[Bug target/96372] [11 regression] arm/ivopts.c fails since r11-2012

[akrl at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96372

akrl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||akrl at gcc dot gnu.org
   Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org  |akrl at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #1 from akrl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Will take a look

[Bug target/96372] [11 regression] arm/ivopts.c fails since r11-2012

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96372

Richard Biener  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Priority|P3  |P1

[Bug target/96372] [11 regression] arm/ivopts.c fails since r11-2012

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96372

Richard Biener  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Version|10.0|11.0
   Target Milestone|--- |11.0