[Bug target/97638] aarch64: bti c is missing at function entry with branch-protection

2021-02-08 Thread wilco at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97638

Wilco  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |FIXED
 CC||wilco at gcc dot gnu.org
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

--- Comment #3 from Wilco  ---
Fixed and backported, so close.

[Bug target/97638] aarch64: bti c is missing at function entry with branch-protection

2020-11-09 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97638

--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits  ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Sudakshina Das
:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:454702f5213a7a8b6b3581c29c817b952ce0f184

commit r10-8996-g454702f5213a7a8b6b3581c29c817b952ce0f184
Author: Sudakshina Das 
Date:   Mon Nov 2 15:52:22 2020 +

[PATCH] aarch64: Fix PR97638

Currently the testcase in the patch was failing to produce
a 'bti c' at the beginning of the function. This was because
in aarch64_pac_insn_p, we were wrongly returning at the first
check!

2020-10-30  Sudakshina Das  

gcc/ChangeLog:

PR target/97638
* config/aarch64/aarch64-bti-insert.c (aarch64_pac_insn_p): Update
return value on INSN_P check.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

PR target/97638
* gcc.target/aarch64/pr97638.c: New test.a

(cherry picked from commit ce99142c11b8090105cbf2aa853262f6d9abc0d3)

[Bug target/97638] aarch64: bti c is missing at function entry with branch-protection

2020-11-02 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97638

--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits  ---
The master branch has been updated by Sudakshina Das :

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ce99142c11b8090105cbf2aa853262f6d9abc0d3

commit r11-4615-gce99142c11b8090105cbf2aa853262f6d9abc0d3
Author: Sudakshina Das 
Date:   Mon Nov 2 15:52:22 2020 +

[PATCH] aarch64: Fix PR97638

Currently the testcase in the patch was failing to produce
a 'bti c' at the beginning of the function. This was because
in aarch64_pac_insn_p, we were wrongly returning at the first
check!

2020-10-30  Sudakshina Das  

gcc/ChangeLog:

PR target/97638
* config/aarch64/aarch64-bti-insert.c (aarch64_pac_insn_p): Update
return value on INSN_P check.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

PR target/97638
* gcc.target/aarch64/pr97638.c: New test.a