[Bug testsuite/101528] [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/int_128bit-runnable.c fails after r11-8743
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101528 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||11.2.0 Priority|P3 |P2 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- is this still broken?
[Bug testsuite/101528] [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/int_128bit-runnable.c fails after r11-8743
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101528 --- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Yes, there were still failures in the latest test runs.
[Bug testsuite/101528] [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/int_128bit-runnable.c fails after r11-8743
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101528 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|11.3|11.4 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- GCC 11.3 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 11.4.
[Bug testsuite/101528] [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/int_128bit-runnable.c fails after r11-8743
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101528 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.2
[Bug testsuite/101528] [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/int_128bit-runnable.c fails after r11-8743
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101528 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|11.2|11.3 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- GCC 11.2 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 11.3
[Bug testsuite/101528] [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/int_128bit-runnable.c fails after r11-8743
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101528 Carl Love changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cel at us dot ibm.com --- Comment #6 from Carl Love --- I will look into this and see if the instruction counts have changed for some reason.
[Bug testsuite/101528] [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/int_128bit-runnable.c fails after r11-8743
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101528 --- Comment #7 from Carl Love --- I recently committed a patch to fix the counts. commit 5d336ae49528fde3904c9e5bfc83a450429b2961 Author: Carl Love Date: Fri Mar 10 18:16:52 2023 -0500 rs6000: Fix test int_128bit-runnable.c instruction counts The test reports two failures on Power 10LE: FAIL: .../int_128bit-runnable.c scan-assembler-times mvdivsqM 1 FAIL: .../int_128bit-runnable.c scan-assembler-times mvextsd2qM 6 The current counts are : vdivsq 3 vextsd2q 4 I tested mainline with the head at commit commit 90685c365794e9afabc6cdc7eae7892ba5d2be3d (HEAD -> master, origin/trunk, origin/master, origin/HEAD) Author: Aldy Hernandez Date: Mon May 22 20:15:19 2023 +0200 Implement some miscellaneous zero accessors for Value_Range. ... Test gcc.target/powerpc/int_128bit-runnable.c is currently passing without any regression failures. I believe this bugzilla is ready to close.
[Bug testsuite/101528] [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/int_128bit-runnable.c fails after r11-8743
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101528 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #8 from Peter Bergner --- (In reply to Carl Love from comment #7) > I believe this bugzilla is ready to close. Marking as fixed. Thanks Carl.
[Bug testsuite/101528] [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/int_128bit-runnable.c fails after r11-8743
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101528 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed||2022-12-21 --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek --- Confirmed.