[Bug testsuite/103196] [12 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/p9-vec-length-full-7.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103196 Kewen Lin changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED --- Comment #7 from Kewen Lin --- Fixed on latest trunk.
[Bug testsuite/103196] [12 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/p9-vec-length-full-7.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103196 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Kewen Lin : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3ac111372ecb73cc2464ab27e3bad75dfe88a34b commit r12-8075-g3ac111372ecb73cc2464ab27e3bad75dfe88a34b Author: Kewen Lin Date: Sun Apr 10 21:50:44 2022 -0500 rs6000/test: Adjust p9-vec-length-{full,epil}-7.c [PR103196] As PR103196 shows, complete unrolling pass still takes effect even if we have specified the option "-fno-unroll-loops". The loops in that case are not expected to be transformed by it, otherwise the expected counts change. This patch is to add the disabling option to make them not sensitive to complete unrolling. PR testsuite/103196 gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gcc.target/powerpc/p9-vec-length-epil-7.c: Add option -fdisable-tree-cunroll. * gcc.target/powerpc/p9-vec-length-full-7.c: Likewise.
[Bug testsuite/103196] [12 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/p9-vec-length-full-7.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103196 --- Comment #5 from Kewen Lin --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4) > Or adjust the testcase. Please? Thanks for the suggestion! I adjusted the test case by making it not unrolled any more, as the patch posted at https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-February/590959.html. It's still pending on review. :)
[Bug testsuite/103196] [12 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/p9-vec-length-full-7.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103196 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||testsuite-fail --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Or adjust the testcase. Please?