[Bug testsuite/36440] [4.4 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/cdce3.C on powerpc-apple-darwin8.5.0

2008-09-15 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #8 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-09-15 09:42 ---
Everything seems to be fixed as far as I can see.


-- 

jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36440

[Bug testsuite/36440] [4.4 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/cdce3.C on powerpc-apple-darwin8.5.0

2008-07-13 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #7 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-07-13 22:28 ---
Subject: Bug 36440

Author: danglin
Date: Sun Jul 13 22:27:58 2008
New Revision: 137757

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=137757
Log:
PR testsuite/36440
* tree-call-cdce.c (check_target_format): Accept MIPS single, double
and quad formats.


Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/tree-call-cdce.c


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36440

[Bug testsuite/36440] [4.4 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/cdce3.C on powerpc-apple-darwin8.5.0

2008-06-25 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Priority|P3  |P2


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36440

[Bug testsuite/36440] [4.4 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/cdce3.C on powerpc-apple-darwin8.5.0

2008-06-15 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #5 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-06-15 14:53 ---
Also fails on hppa*-*-*.


-- 

danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu dot
   ||org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36440

[Bug testsuite/36440] [4.4 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/cdce3.C on powerpc-apple-darwin8.5.0

2008-06-15 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #6 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-06-15 19:57 ---
gcc.dg/cdce1.c and gcc.dg/cdce2.c also fail on hppa*-*-*.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36440

[Bug testsuite/36440] [4.4 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/cdce3.C on powerpc-apple-darwin8.5.0

2008-06-11 Thread jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 


-- 

jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|--- |4.4.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36440

[Bug testsuite/36440] [4.4 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/cdce3.C on powerpc-apple-darwin8.5.0

2008-06-10 Thread kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #4 from kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-06-11 01:27 ---
Created an attachment (id=15746)
 -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15746action=view)
patch

From the reports on gcc-testresults, cdce3.C fails on some
other targets:

arm-none-linux-gnueabi
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-06/msg00404.html
powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-06/msg00430.html
sh4-unknown-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-06/msg00494.html
powerpc-ibm-aix5.3.0.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-06/msg00508.html
i386-unknown-freebsd6.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-06/msg00522.html
mipsel-unknown-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-06/msg00555.html

though now cdce3.C test is skipped on darwin.
It fails also for some *-elf embedded targets.  For these
*-linux* and *-elf targets, it seems that the lack of 'l'
suffixed math functions causes errors.
How about the attached patch?  It tests long double math
functions only for the targets having true long double and
skips tests for pow10*/exp10* functions which are gnu extensions
on *-*-darwin*.
It's tested for i686-pc-linux-gnu, powerpc-apple-darwin9.0.0,
sh-unknown-elf and sh4-unknown-linux-gnu.  I'm not sure
how this test fails on AIX and FreeBSD, though.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36440

[Bug testsuite/36440] [4.4 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/cdce3.C on powerpc-apple-darwin8.5.0

2008-06-06 Thread davidxl at google dot com 


--- Comment #2 from davidxl at google dot com  2008-06-06 18:00 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
 The failures disappear with the following patch:
 
 --- /opt/gcc/_gcc_clean/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cdce3.C2008-06-05
 08:50:23.0 +0200
 +++ /opt/gcc/gcc-4.4-work/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cdce3.C  2008-06-06
 13:50:12.0 +0200
 @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
 -/* { dg-do  run { target { ! *-*-darwin } } } */
 +/* { dg-do  run { target { ! *-*-darwin* } } } */
  /* { dg-options -O2 -fmath-errno -fdump-tree-cdce-details  -lm } */
  /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump  cdce3.C:68: note: function call is
 shrink-wrapped into error conditions\. cdce } }*/
  /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump  cdce3.C:69: note: function call is
 shrink-wrapped into error conditions\. cdce } }*/
 
 (at least on i686-apple-darwin9).
 

I wonder why gcc.dg/cdce1.c and gcc.dg/cdce2.c do not fail in the same way?

David


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36440

[Bug testsuite/36440] [4.4 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/cdce3.C on powerpc-apple-darwin8.5.0

2008-06-06 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 


--- Comment #3 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr  2008-06-06 18:17 ---
 I wonder why gcc.dg/cdce1.c and gcc.dg/cdce2.c do not fail in the same way?

Because the tests pass (as far as I can tell from the tests
oni686-apple-darwin9).


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36440