[Bug testsuite/63971] Some of gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_*.c tests fail now

2015-10-29 Thread mshawcroft at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63971

mshawcroft at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 CC||mshawcroft at gcc dot gnu.org
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

--- Comment #10 from mshawcroft at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Fixed by Tejas


[Bug testsuite/63971] Some of gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_*.c tests fail now

2015-01-19 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63971

Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
 Resolution|FIXED   |---
 Ever confirmed|1   |0

--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
And now they fail again.  We need to add back the patch since conditional
compares optimization is now in.

This was one of the reasons why I did not revert my patch in the first place
because I knew it would be back in for GCC 5.


[Bug testsuite/63971] Some of gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_*.c tests fail now

2015-01-19 Thread belagod at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63971

--- Comment #9 from Tejas Belagod belagod at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: belagod
Date: Mon Jan 19 12:57:48 2015
New Revision: 219838

URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219838root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-01-19  Tejas Belagod  tejas.bela...@arm.com

PR target/63971
* gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_1.c: Expect only two loads of x30 (in
the epilogue).
* gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_6.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_2.c: Expect only one pair load of x30
and x19 (in the epilogue).
* gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_4.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_7.c: Likewise.


Modified:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_1.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_2.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_4.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_6.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_7.c


[Bug testsuite/63971] Some of gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_*.c tests fail now

2015-01-15 Thread belagod at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63971

--- Comment #6 from Tejas Belagod belagod at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: belagod
Date: Thu Jan 15 18:17:23 2015
New Revision: 219674

URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219674root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-01-15  Tejas Belagod  tejas.bela...@arm.com

PR target/63971
* gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_1.c: Revert to 3 loads of x30
in epilogue.
* gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_6.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_2.c: Revert to 2 pair loads of
x30 and x19 (in the epilogue).
* gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_4.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_7.c: Likewise.


Modified:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_1.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_2.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_4.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_6.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_7.c


[Bug testsuite/63971] Some of gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_*.c tests fail now

2015-01-15 Thread belagod at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63971

Tejas Belagod belagod at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

--- Comment #7 from Tejas Belagod belagod at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Fixed.


[Bug testsuite/63971] Some of gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_*.c tests fail now

2015-01-09 Thread belagod at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63971

Tejas Belagod belagod at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
 CC||belagod at gcc dot gnu.org
 Resolution|FIXED   |---

--- Comment #4 from Tejas Belagod belagod at gcc dot gnu.org ---
It looks like this still fails on trunk.


[Bug testsuite/63971] Some of gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_*.c tests fail now

2015-01-09 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63971

--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Tejas Belagod from comment #4)
 It looks like this still fails on trunk.

That is because the conditional compares patch was reverted but my patch was
not.  Just revert my patch for the testsuite.


[Bug testsuite/63971] Some of gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_*.c tests fail now

2014-11-22 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63971

--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: pinskia
Date: Sat Nov 22 23:41:26 2014
New Revision: 217975

URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217975root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-11-22  Andrew Pinski  apin...@cavium.com

PR target/63971
* gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_1.c: Expect only two loads of
x30 (in the epilogue).
* gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_6.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_2.c: Expect only one pair load of
x30 and x19 (in the epilogue).
* gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_4.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_7.c: Likewise.



Modified:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_1.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_2.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_4.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_6.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_7.c


[Bug testsuite/63971] Some of gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_*.c tests fail now

2014-11-22 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63971

Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Fixed.


[Bug testsuite/63971] Some of gcc.target/aarch64/test_frame_*.c tests fail now

2014-11-19 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63971

Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
   Last reconfirmed||2014-11-19
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I have a patch which I will submit this weekend.