[Bug testsuite/69371] UNRESOLVED: special_functions/18_riemann_zeta/check_value.cc compilation failed to produce executable

2016-02-15 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69371

Jonathan Wakely  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug testsuite/69371] UNRESOLVED: special_functions/18_riemann_zeta/check_value.cc compilation failed to produce executable

2016-02-14 Thread thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69371

Thomas Preud'homme  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
  Known to work||6.0
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

--- Comment #7 from Thomas Preud'homme  ---
Fixed as of r233391.

[Bug testsuite/69371] UNRESOLVED: special_functions/18_riemann_zeta/check_value.cc compilation failed to produce executable

2016-02-04 Thread jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69371

James Greenhalgh  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Target|arm-none-eabi   |arm-none-eabi,
   ||aarch64-none-elf,
   ||aarch64_be-none-elf
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
   Last reconfirmed||2016-02-04
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #6 from James Greenhalgh  ---
Confirmed, and also seen on aarch64-none-elf and aarch64_be-none-elf.

[Bug testsuite/69371] UNRESOLVED: special_functions/18_riemann_zeta/check_value.cc compilation failed to produce executable

2016-01-21 Thread 3dw4rd at verizon dot net 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69371

--- Comment #5 from Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net> ---
On 01/20/2016 11:46 PM, thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69371
>
> --- Comment #4 from Thomas Preud'homme  ---
> Doh, I should have caught that earlier. The bug can be seen in:
>
> % grep -c dg-option special_functions/18_riemann_zeta/check_value.cc
> 3
>
> Using dg-additional-option for the timeout solves the issue. Maybe the patch
> could also remove the redundant timeout adjustment in the testcase?
>
I'll take care of that.
My deja-fu is wobbly...

[Bug testsuite/69371] UNRESOLVED: special_functions/18_riemann_zeta/check_value.cc compilation failed to produce executable

2016-01-20 Thread thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69371

--- Comment #4 from Thomas Preud'homme  ---
Doh, I should have caught that earlier. The bug can be seen in:

% grep -c dg-option special_functions/18_riemann_zeta/check_value.cc
3

Using dg-additional-option for the timeout solves the issue. Maybe the patch
could also remove the redundant timeout adjustment in the testcase?

[Bug testsuite/69371] UNRESOLVED: special_functions/18_riemann_zeta/check_value.cc compilation failed to produce executable

2016-01-20 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69371

--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely  ---
(In reply to Ed Smith-Rowland from comment #2)
> The message looks more like a header - cmath - is not included or that 
> the line
> // { dg-options "-D__STDCPP_WANT_MATH_SPEC_FUNCS__" }
> or equivalent is not set.
> 
> But my fresh checkout has the necessary things..

Yes, I wondered if including  first was somehow preventing the extra
bits of  being included but it looks OK to me.

Preprocessed source will tell us what's happening.

[Bug testsuite/69371] UNRESOLVED: special_functions/18_riemann_zeta/check_value.cc compilation failed to produce executable

2016-01-20 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69371

--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely  ---
Lots of other files use that function and don't have those directives either,
e.g. testsuite/special_functions/18_riemann_zeta/compile.cc

Is that also failing?

Could you attach or send me preprocessed source for the failing test?

[Bug testsuite/69371] UNRESOLVED: special_functions/18_riemann_zeta/check_value.cc compilation failed to produce executable

2016-01-20 Thread 3dw4rd at verizon dot net 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69371

--- Comment #2 from Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net> ---
On 01/19/2016 10:19 PM, thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69371
>
>  Bug ID: 69371
> Summary: UNRESOLVED:
>  special_functions/18_riemann_zeta/check_value.cc
>  compilation failed to produce executable
> Product: gcc
> Version: 6.0
>  Status: UNCONFIRMED
>Severity: normal
>Priority: P3
>   Component: testsuite
>Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
>Reporter: thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org
>  CC: 3dw4rd at verizon dot net, CaptainSifff at gmx dot de,
>  redi at gcc dot gnu.org
>Target Milestone: ---
>  Target: arm-none-eabi
>
> Hi,
>
> special_functions/18_riemann_zeta/check_value.cc fails to build on
> arm-none-eabi targets with the following error:
>
> libstdc++-v3/testsuite/special_functions/18_riemann_zeta/check_value.cc: In
> function 'void test(const testcase_riemann_zeta (&)[Num], Tp)':
> libstdc++-v3/testsuite/special_functions/18_riemann_zeta/check_value.cc:285:15:
> error: 'riemann_zeta' is not a member of 'std'
>
> Since special_functions/18_riemann_zeta/check_nan.cc builds successfully, I
> suppose that's due to missing one or all of the following directives:
>
> // { dg-require-c-std "" }
> // { dg-add-options ieee }
>
> which are present for check_nan.cc but not for check_value.cc
>
I would expect that the whole special function test suite would fail.
I do remember we had a timeout issue with riemann zeta on some targets.

The message looks more like a header - cmath - is not included or that 
the line
// { dg-options "-D__STDCPP_WANT_MATH_SPEC_FUNCS__" }
or equivalent is not set.

But my fresh checkout has the necessary things..