[Bug testsuite/70230] 11 test regressions when building GCC 6 with --enable-default-ssp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70230 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Fixed on the trunk.
[Bug testsuite/70230] 11 test regressions when building GCC 6 with --enable-default-ssp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70230 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:90c31ff339015ddd89ac519656fbd23a36ee6271 commit r12-6922-g90c31ff339015ddd89ac519656fbd23a36ee6271 Author: Allan McRae Date: Fri Jan 28 12:44:08 2022 -0500 testsuite/70230 - fix failures with default SSP\ Configuring with --enable-default-ssp triggers various testsuite failures. These contain asm statements that are not compatible with -fstack-protector. Adding -fno-stack-protector to dg-options to work around this issue. Tested on x86_64-linux. PR testsuite/70230 * gcc.dg/asan/use-after-scope-4.c (dg-options): Add -fno-stack-protector. * gcc.dg/stack-usage-1.c: Likewise * gcc.dg/superblock.c: Likewise * gcc.target/i386/avx-vzeroupper-17.c: Likewise * gcc.target/i386/cleanup-1.c: Likewise * gcc.target/i386/cleanup-2.c: Likewise * gcc.target/i386/interrupt-redzone-1.c: Likewise * gcc.target/i386/interrupt-redzone-2.c: Likewise * gcc.target/i386/pr79793-1.c: Likewise * gcc.target/i386/pr79793-2.c: Likewise * gcc.target/i386/shrink_wrap_1.c: Likewise * gcc.target/i386/stack-check-11.c: Likewise * gcc.target/i386/stack-check-18.c: Likewise * gcc.target/i386/stack-check-19.c: Likewise * gcc.target/i386/stackalign/pr88483-1.c: Likewise * gcc.target/i386/stackalign/pr88483-2.c: Likewise * gcc.target/i386/sw-1.c: Likewise
[Bug testsuite/70230] 11 test regressions when building GCC 6 with --enable-default-ssp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70230 Allan McRae changed: What|Removed |Added CC||allan at archlinux dot org --- Comment #5 from Allan McRae --- Created attachment 52286 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52286=edit Fix testsuite issues with --enable-default-ssp Add -fno-stack-protector to dg-options where needed. Fixes the following testsuite failures from adding --enable-default-ssp to configure: FAIL: gcc.dg/asan/use-after-scope-4.c -O0 execution test FAIL: gcc.dg/stack-usage-1.c scan-stack-usage foo\\t(256|264)\\tstatic FAIL: gcc.dg/superblock.c scan-rtl-dump-times sched2 "ADVANCING TO" 2 FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx-vzeroupper-17.c scan-assembler-times avx_vzeroupper 1 FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cleanup-1.c execution test FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cleanup-2.c execution test FAIL: gcc.target/i386/interrupt-redzone-1.c scan-assembler-not \\tcld FAIL: gcc.target/i386/interrupt-redzone-2.c scan-assembler-not \\tcld FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr79793-1.c scan-assembler-times add[lq][\\t ]*\$400,[\\t ]*%[re]sp 1 FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr79793-1.c scan-assembler-times fxsave64[\\t ]*-120(%[re]sp) 1 FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr79793-1.c scan-assembler-times sub[lq][\\t ]*\$400,[\\t ]*%[re]sp 1 FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr79793-2.c scan-assembler-times add[lq][\\t ]*\$400,[\\t ]*%[re]sp 1 FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr79793-2.c scan-assembler-times fxsave64[\\t ]*-120(%[re]sp) 1 FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr79793-2.c scan-assembler-times sub[lq][\\t ]*\$392,[\\t ]*%[re]sp 1 FAIL: gcc.target/i386/shrink_wrap_1.c scan-rtl-dump pro_and_epilogue "Performing shrink-wrapping" FAIL: gcc.target/i386/stack-check-11.c scan-assembler-times or[ql] 3 FAIL: gcc.target/i386/stack-check-11.c scan-assembler-times sub[ql] 4 FAIL: gcc.target/i386/stack-check-18.c scan-assembler-times or[ql] 1 FAIL: gcc.target/i386/stack-check-19.c scan-assembler-times (?:je|jne) 3 FAIL: gcc.target/i386/stack-check-19.c scan-assembler-times or[ql] 2 FAIL: gcc.target/i386/sw-1.c scan-rtl-dump pro_and_epilogue "Performing shrink-wrapping" FAIL: gcc.target/i386/stackalign/pr88483-1.c -mno-stackrealign scan-assembler-not (sub|add)(l|q)[t ]*\$[0-9]*,[t ]*%[re]?sp FAIL: gcc.target/i386/stackalign/pr88483-1.c -mno-stackrealign scan-assembler-not and[lq]?[^n]*-[0-9]+,[^n]*sp FAIL: gcc.target/i386/stackalign/pr88483-1.c -mstackrealign scan-assembler-not (sub|add)(l|q)[t ]*\$[0-9]*,[t ]*%[re]?sp FAIL: gcc.target/i386/stackalign/pr88483-1.c -mstackrealign scan-assembler-not and[lq]?[^n]*-[0-9]+,[^n]*sp FAIL: gcc.target/i386/stackalign/pr88483-2.c -mno-stackrealign scan-assembler-not and[lq]?[^n]*-[0-9]+,[^n]*sp FAIL: gcc.target/i386/stackalign/pr88483-2.c -mstackrealign scan-assembler-not and[lq]?[^n]*-[0-9]+,[^n]*sp
[Bug testsuite/70230] 11 test regressions when building GCC 6 with --enable-default-ssp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70230
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed||2018-09-24
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
I also saw
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cleanup-1.c execution test
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cleanup-2.c execution test
on trunk with --enable-default-ssp. They contain asm statements which
aren't compatible with -fstack-protector. Adding -fno-stack-protector:
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/cleanup-1.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/cleanup-1.c
index dcfcc4edb5f..4a74ec2fb0f 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/cleanup-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/cleanup-1.c
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
/* { dg-do run { target *-*-linux* *-*-gnu* } } */
-/* { dg-options "-fexceptions -fnon-call-exceptions
-fasynchronous-unwind-tables -O2" } */
+/* { dg-options "-fno-stack-protector -fexceptions -fnon-call-exceptions
-fasynchronous-unwind-tables -O2" } */
/* Test complex CFA value expressions. */
#include
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/cleanup-2.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/cleanup-2.c
index 7e60323373b..d4cf30984e4 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/cleanup-2.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/cleanup-2.c
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
/* { dg-do run { target { *-*-linux* && { ! ia32 } } } } */
-/* { dg-options "-fexceptions -fnon-call-exceptions
-fasynchronous-unwind-tables -O2" } */
+/* { dg-options "-fno-stack-protector -fexceptions -fnon-call-exceptions
-fasynchronous-unwind-tables -O2" } */
/* Test complex CFA value expressions. */
#include
fixed them.
[Bug testsuite/70230] 11 test regressions when building GCC 6 with --enable-default-ssp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70230 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to psturm from comment #2) > 2 new failures appeared when testing with only --enable-default-ssp using > the hjl/pr70150 branch: > > > FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cleanup-1.c execution test > > FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cleanup-2.c execution test > > Are these also to be expected or is it something more? Let's ask HJ
[Bug testsuite/70230] 11 test regressions when building GCC 6 with --enable-default-ssp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70230 --- Comment #2 from psturm at computervoice dot com --- 2 new failures appeared when testing with only --enable-default-ssp using the hjl/pr70150 branch: > FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cleanup-1.c execution test > FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cleanup-2.c execution test Are these also to be expected or is it something more?
[Bug testsuite/70230] 11 test regressions when building GCC 6 with --enable-default-ssp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70230 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-* Component|regression |testsuite --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- These are harmless and somewhat expected if you change default options. I suppose even a dg-skip-if -fstack-protector can't fix those because the option is not seen. Testsuite issue in the end, but very very low priority. x86_64 I suppose.
