https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97699
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Christophe Lyon from comment #0)
> BTW, there's a typo in the error message, it should say
> fzero-call-used-regs rather than fzero-call-used_regs (that is '-' instead
> of '_' before 'regs')
That one I fixed as obvious in
r11-4721-g243492e2c69741b91dbfe3bba9b772f65fc9354c
Otherwise, Richard S wrote regarding the FAIL + sorry:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-November/558041.html
> these are a signal to target maintainers that they need
> to decide whether to add support or accept the status quo
> (in which case a new effective-target will be needed). See:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-October/557595.html:
>
>The new tests are likely to fail on some targets with the sorry()
>message, but I think target maintainers are best placed to decide
>whether (a) that's a fundamental restriction of the target and the
>tests should just be skipped or (b) the target needs to implement
>the new hook.
