[Bug tree-optimization/103041] [12 regression] gcc.dg/vect/slp-reduc-10a.c etc. FAIL

[luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103041

luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #5 from luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org ---
duplicate and fixed.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 103029 ***

[Bug tree-optimization/103041] [12 regression] gcc.dg/vect/slp-reduc-10a.c etc. FAIL

[ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103041

--- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE  ---
> --- Comment #1 from luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> Could you please verify whether it is caused by r12-4818 instead of r12-4819?
> r12-4819 is a NFC patch which seems more unlikely,  and r12-4818 also ICEs in
> PR103029, it is possibly a duplicate of that.
>
>
> commit f35af8df241a9eb9c2edf7da26d3c5f53d6e2511
> Author: Xionghu Luo 
> Date:   Mon Nov 1 00:12:36 2021 -0500
>
> Refactor loop_version

It is indeed r12-4818 that introduced the failures on sparc.

[Bug tree-optimization/103041] [12 regression] gcc.dg/vect/slp-reduc-10a.c etc. FAIL

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103041

--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener  ---
The dup was fixed, please close as duplicate in case the sparc issue goes away
as well.

[Bug tree-optimization/103041] [12 regression] gcc.dg/vect/slp-reduc-10a.c etc. FAIL

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103041

Richard Biener  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org  |rguenth at gcc dot 
gnu.org
 CC|rguenther at suse dot de   |rguenth at gcc dot 
gnu.org

--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener  ---
Probably a duplicate of PR103029.

[Bug tree-optimization/103041] [12 regression] gcc.dg/vect/slp-reduc-10a.c etc. FAIL

[luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103041

--- Comment #1 from luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Could you please verify whether it is caused by r12-4818 instead of r12-4819?
r12-4819 is a NFC patch which seems more unlikely,  and r12-4818 also ICEs in
PR103029, it is possibly a duplicate of that.


commit f35af8df241a9eb9c2edf7da26d3c5f53d6e2511
Author: Xionghu Luo 
Date:   Mon Nov 1 00:12:36 2021 -0500

Refactor loop_version

[Bug tree-optimization/103041] [12 regression] gcc.dg/vect/slp-reduc-10a.c etc. FAIL

[ro at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103041

Rainer Orth  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|--- |12.0