[Bug tree-optimization/106878] [11/12 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed at -O2 with pointers and bitwise calculation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106878 --- Comment #19 from Alex Coplan --- (In reply to Alex Coplan from comment #18) > So for backports, it sounds like we want r13-2658 without the verify_gimple > changes, and the other two patches as is. Is that right? Would it make sense > to squash these if we were to backport them or should they be kept as > separate patches? FWIW I tested the backports as described above on the GCC 12 branch, bootstrap/regtest passed on both x86_64-linux-gnu and aarch64-linux-gnu. Is it OK to backport those patches to GCC 12?
[Bug tree-optimization/106878] [11/12 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed at -O2 with pointers and bitwise calculation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106878 --- Comment #18 from Alex Coplan --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #15) > Just note this had various follow-ups. > r13-2658 > r13-2709 > r13-2891 > at least. So for backports, it sounds like we want r13-2658 without the verify_gimple changes, and the other two patches as is. Is that right? Would it make sense to squash these if we were to backport them or should they be kept as separate patches?
[Bug tree-optimization/106878] [11/12 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed at -O2 with pointers and bitwise calculation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106878 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|11.4|11.5 --- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 11.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 11.5.
[Bug tree-optimization/106878] [11/12 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed at -O2 with pointers and bitwise calculation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106878 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #16 from Andrew Pinski --- *** Bug 109841 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
[Bug tree-optimization/106878] [11/12 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed at -O2 with pointers and bitwise calculation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106878 --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek --- Just note this had various follow-ups. r13-2658 r13-2709 r13-2891 at least.
[Bug tree-optimization/106878] [11/12 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed at -O2 with pointers and bitwise calculation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106878 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-checking --- Comment #14 from Richard Biener --- Iff then I think we want to backport all but the verifier changes.
[Bug tree-optimization/106878] [11/12 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed at -O2 with pointers and bitwise calculation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106878 vvinayag at arm dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vvinayag at arm dot com --- Comment #13 from vvinayag at arm dot com --- Will this fix be backported to GCC 12 and GCC 11 ?
[Bug tree-optimization/106878] [11/12 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed at -O2 with pointers and bitwise calculation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106878 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||julien.staub at se dot com --- Comment #12 from Martin Liška --- *** Bug 108340 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
[Bug tree-optimization/106878] [11/12 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed at -O2 with pointers and bitwise calculation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106878 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[11/12/13 Regression] ICE: |[11/12 Regression] ICE: |verify_gimple failed at -O2 |verify_gimple failed at -O2 |with pointers and bitwise |with pointers and bitwise |caluclation |calculation --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- Fixed on the trunk I believe.
