[Bug tree-optimization/110173] [13/14 Regression] Missed Dead Code Elimination when using __builtin_unreachable

[law at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110173

Jeffrey A. Law  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Priority|P3  |P2
 CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/110173] [13/14 Regression] Missed Dead Code Elimination when using __builtin_unreachable

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110173

Richard Biener  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|13.2|13.3

--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener  ---
GCC 13.2 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 13.3.

[Bug tree-optimization/110173] [13/14 Regression] Missed Dead Code Elimination when using __builtin_unreachable

[theodort at inf dot ethz.ch via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110173

--- Comment #7 from Theodoros Theodoridis  ---
The modified case (s/j();/j(0);/) bisects to r13-1934-g353fd1ec3df

[Bug tree-optimization/110173] [13/14 Regression] Missed Dead Code Elimination when using __builtin_unreachable

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110173

Andrew Pinski  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|Missed Dead Code|[13/14 Regression] Missed
   |Elimination when using  |Dead Code Elimination when
   |__builtin_unreachable since |using __builtin_unreachable
   |r14-569-g21e2ef2dc25|
 Ever confirmed|0   |1
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
   Last reconfirmed||2023-06-08
   Target Milestone|--- |13.2

--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski  ---
s/j();/j(0);/
Actually worked in GCC 12.3.0 but failed in GCC 13.1.0 so that is a regression
there.

But definitely unrelated to that GCC 14 change.