[Bug tree-optimization/111495] [14 regression] ICE in lower_bound, at value-range.h:1078 when building LLVM 17.0.1 since r14-3644-g1aceceb1e2d6e8

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111495

--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski  ---
I suspect r14-4192-g4d80863d7f93c0a839d1fe5 fixed this ...

[Bug tree-optimization/111495] [14 regression] ICE in lower_bound, at value-range.h:1078 when building LLVM 17.0.1 since r14-3644-g1aceceb1e2d6e8

[sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111495

--- Comment #4 from Sam James  ---
trying..

[Bug tree-optimization/111495] [14 regression] ICE in lower_bound, at value-range.h:1078 when building LLVM 17.0.1 since r14-3644-g1aceceb1e2d6e8

[guojiufu at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111495

--- Comment #5 from Jiu Fu Guo  ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> I suspect r14-4192-g4d80863d7f93c0a839d1fe5 fixed this ...

Yes, I reproduced this issue on ppc64le, and the fix r14-4192 seems to work
fine.

[Bug tree-optimization/111495] [14 regression] ICE in lower_bound, at value-range.h:1078 when building LLVM 17.0.1 since r14-3644-g1aceceb1e2d6e8

[sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111495

Sam James  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |FIXED
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

--- Comment #6 from Sam James  ---
Yeah, all fine now. Thanks!