[Bug tree-optimization/113714] [11/12/13/14 Regression] Missed optimization for redundancy computation elimination: -(w+d-x)-x => -(w+d)

2024-03-07 Thread law at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113714

Jeffrey A. Law  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Priority|P3  |P2
 CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/113714] [11/12/13/14 Regression] Missed optimization for redundancy computation elimination: -(w+d-x)-x => -(w+d)

2024-02-11 Thread pheeck at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113714

Filip Kastl  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||aldyh at redhat dot com,
   ||pheeck at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #3 from Filip Kastl  ---
For x86_64, I've bisected the regression to r11-1146-g1396fa5b91cfa0

[Bug tree-optimization/113714] [11/12/13/14 Regression] Missed optimization for redundancy computation elimination: -(w+d-x)-x => -(w+d)

2024-02-03 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113714

Andrew Pinski  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Known to fail|11.1.0  |

--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski  ---
Hmm, for x86_64, it regressed in GCC 11 but for aarch64, it seems like it is
only a regression on the trunk ...

[Bug tree-optimization/113714] [11/12/13/14 Regression] Missed optimization for redundancy computation elimination: -(w+d-x)-x => -(w+d)

2024-02-03 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113714

Andrew Pinski  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Ever confirmed|0   |1
   Last reconfirmed||2024-02-04
   Target Milestone|--- |11.5
   Keywords||needs-bisection
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski  ---
Confirmed.