[Bug tree-optimization/14052] Combiner weakness

2013-11-09 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14052

Bug 14052 depends on bug 15357, which changed state.

Bug 15357 Summary: [tree-ssa] combing if statements
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15357

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug tree-optimization/14052] Combiner weakness

2007-03-05 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-03-05 17:03 ---
Subject: Bug 14052

Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Mar  5 17:03:14 2007
New Revision: 122559

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=122559
Log:
2007-03-05  Richard Guenther  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

PR tree-optimization/14052
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp33.c: New testcase.

Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp33.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14052

[Bug tree-optimization/14052] Combiner weakness

2007-03-05 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-03-05 17:03 ---
It was fixed by the fix for PR15911.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  BugsThisDependsOn||15911


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14052

[Bug tree-optimization/14052] Combiner weakness

2007-03-02 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-03-02 16:23 ---
VRP can do this on the mainline.  Fixed.  (I'll add a testcase)


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED
   Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14052

[Bug tree-optimization/14052] Combiner weakness

2005-02-14 Thread law at redhat dot com 

--- Additional Comments From law at redhat dot com  2005-02-14 20:13 ---
It seems to me that the SSA optimizers ought to have removed the redundant test
well before we get into the RTL code.  And it appears to me that they do  I
get identical code for both tests out of the SSA optimizers.

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 CC||law at redhat dot com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14052