[Bug tree-optimization/15348] [tree-ssa] Convert (x < 0) || (y < 0) into (x | y) < 0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15348 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Resolved at some point in the past. Not worth the trouble to bisect.
[Bug tree-optimization/15348] [tree-ssa] Convert (x < 0) || (y < 0) into (x | y) < 0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15348 Dmitry G. Dyachenko changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dimhen at gmail dot com --- Comment #4 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko --- x86_64 r10-7080 for me produce identical code -- c#0 with -O2 -- c#1 with -O
[Bug tree-optimization/15348] [tree-ssa] Convert (x < 0) || (y < 0) into (x | y) < 0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15348 Bug 15348 depends on bug 15459, which changed state. Bug 15459 Summary: [meta-bug] there should be a tree combiner like the rtl one https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15459 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED
[Bug tree-optimization/15348] [tree-ssa] Convert (x < 0) || (y < 0) into (x | y) < 0.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15348 Bug 15348 depends on bug 15357, which changed state. Bug 15357 Summary: [tree-ssa] combing if statements http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15357 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED
[Bug tree-optimization/15348] [tree-ssa] Convert (x < 0) || (y < 0) into (x | y) < 0.
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-30 22:29 --- For AMD64, the functions from the first test case don't produce the same code either, so combine is not catching this either. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15348